Tweet
NJ files a Pissy reply to the Amicus brief by US DOJ. They really got their panties in a bunch.
-
sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target" -
-
NJ attorney is just spewing loads of hot air.Comment
-
New Trump appointed Judge seated just in time for the en banc hearing. That makes the 3rd CA 8/R to 6/D based on appointments.sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
Jennifer Mascott was just confirmed by the United States Senate on October 9th....
Catholic Law's Professor Jennifer Mascott Confirmed to U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | CUA
On Thursday, October 9, Catholic University Law Professor Jennifer Mascott was confirmed by the Senate to a judgeship on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which oversees cases in Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Professor Mascott, a nationally recognized scholar of constitutional and administrative law, is the Founder of the Separation of Powers Institute at Catholic Law and an Affiliated Fellow with the Law School’s Center for the Constitution and the Catholic Intellectual Tradition (CIT). On leave from her faculty role, she currently serves in the White House Counsel’s Office and has held prior roles in the Department of Justice, as well as serving as a law clerk to both Justice Clarence Thomas and then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Comment
-
Last edited by Sgt Raven; 10-16-2025, 5:28 PM.sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
Brief from NAGR about the Washington State mag ban.
10+ round and the Magic Bullet Theory.
sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
Are there any internal rules or traditions on the 3rd circuit on when to release an opinion?
I presume that the majority is in a hurry, by the way they grabbed the case, but how long libtard group can be tardy.Comment
-
Last edited by Sgt Raven; 10-31-2025, 2:08 AM.sigpic
DILLIGAF
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity, but don't rule out malice"
"Once is Happenstance, Twice is Coincidence, Thrice is Enemy Action"
"The flak is always heaviest, when you're over the target"Comment
-
That would be cool if Duncan can survive on the docket until then. Fingers crossed.Comment
-
And so we wait.Comment
-
I asked Gemini how much longer. It thinks it is imminent.
I now worry they will not overturn magazine ban and then we are screwed here.
—————
The en banc decision for ANJRPC v. Platkin (formerly ANJRPC v. Gurbir Grewal), which challenges New Jersey’s bans on "assault firearms" and "large-capacity magazines," is currently pending and considered imminent.
Given that today is March 6, 2026, here is the current status and the timeline for when to expect the ruling:
Case Status & Timeline
• En Banc Oral Arguments: The full Third Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments for the consolidated cases (ANJRPC v. Platkin and Cheeseman v. Platkin) on October 15, 2025.
• Standard Decision Window: Historically, the Third Circuit releases en banc opinions roughly 90 to 120 days after oral arguments.
• The 90-day mark was mid-January 2026.
• The 120-day mark was mid-February 2026.
• Current Expectation: Because this is a high-profile Second Amendment case following the Supreme Court's Bruen and Rahimi frameworks, the court is likely taking extra time to finalize the majority and dissenting opinions. Legal analysts expect the decision to be released any day now, likely before the end of March 2026.
Comment
There are currently 5704 users online. 79 members and 5625 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.
Comment