Mike Savage is a hypocrite and I am losing respect for him.

[DonaldBabbett]

Mike Savage, on AM con-talk national radio, even though he condemns liberals and preaches gun rights at times STILL condones the lifetime gun prohibition for dishonorable and bad conduct military discharges under the Gun Control Act of 1968 signed in by that Dem-Lib butt-wipe L.B. Johnson!

Yes, my friends, somebody may have been booted out of the army for being an incompetent soldier or even for disobeying an order he had felt morally objectionable or questionable. This person as an American civilian should still have full rights under the Bill of Rights. Just because I may have told my CO disrespectfully to "f__k off!" as a soldier doesn't mean I should forever be deprived of the means of self-preservation.

The Gun Control Act of 1968 along with the National Firearms Act of 1934, under New-Deal Dem-Lib F.D. Roosevelt are two pieces of federal legislative pulp I long to see shredded and burned to a crisp.

[USMCM16A2]

Bull****. That bastard that killed those 26 people in Texas was prohibited and still managed to get firearms. You go into the military you know what you were in for. So keep the prohibition. A2

[Milsurps]

Sorry, I agree to disagree with you DB.

I gave up on Mike Savage years ago.

[DonaldBabbett]

Bull****. That bastard that killed those 26 people in Texas was prohibited and still managed to get firearms. You go into the military you know what you were in for. So keep the prohibition. A2

That bastard killed people because he was bad. People who get dishonorable discharges from the military are not necessarily violent or criminal: they might just be subversive and rebuke authority.

Most of these modern-era mass shooters on CNN these days passed the FBI background checks and the anti-gun provisions under the Gun Control Act of 1968 even. Look at what good these prohibitions did.

Much more often than not, well-intentioned American citizens are wrongfully prohibited.

[rp55]

Did you bother to look up what he was convicted of? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/u...ley-texas.html. You don't get a DD or BCD for disrespect. A conviction at a General Court Martial carries the same weight as a Federal felony conviction. I have zero problems with that. And I don't want that doucheweasel Bo Bergdahl to be armed either.

[DaveInOroValley]

He's done that in the past as well, he seems to be forget things like that. Personally don't listen to any AM talk anymore. Too many advertisements and not enough talk.

[Subotai]

He had the felony type of BCD, not the misdemeanor type. He shouldn't have had weapons under current law.

[DonaldBabbett]

Did you bother to look up what he was convicted of? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/u...ley-texas.html. You don't get a DD or BCD for disrespect. A conviction at a General Court Martial carries the same weight as a Federal felony conviction. I have zero problems with that. And I don't want that doucheweasel Bo Bergdahl to be armed either.

I don't think even convicted felons should be barred from gun ownership for life provided they satisfactorily served their sentence in full and are lawfully released into society. If their crimes were heinous enough, they should never be released anyway. Perhaps, that military man should have been put away in Leavenworth for life given the heinous acts on his wife and that little boy. I personally hate people who abuse animals like that man did by hitting an innocent dog in the head.

I believe when you are done doing your time in jail, you should get your guns and horses back the way it was in the Old West.

[-hanko]

I don't think even convicted felons should be barred from gun ownership for life provided they satisfactorily served their sentence in full and are lawfully released into society. If their crimes were heinous enough, they should never be released anyway.

I believe when you are done doing your time in jail, you should get your guns and horses back the way it was in the Old West.

It matters not what you think. You sign the 4473 knowing lying or "misstatements" are covered by federal perjury laws.

What's the issue?

Off Topic, do you know a Calguns user with the screen name "SoCalEnthusiast"?

[dustoff31]

I don't think even convicted felons should be barred from gun ownership for life provided they satisfactorily served their sentence in full and are lawfully released into society. If their crimes were heinous enough, they should never be released anyway. Perhaps, that military man should have been put away in Leavenworth for life given the heinous acts on his wife and that little boy. I personally hate people who abuse animals like that man did by hitting an innocent dog in the head.

But released felons haven't served their sentence in full. Part of the sentence is that they are forever barred from possessing firearms.

I believe when you are done doing your time in jail, you should get your guns and horses back the way it was in the Old West.

See above. In the Old West, felons were not released from prison. They were hanged.

[DonaldBabbett]

It matters not what you think. You sign the 4473 knowing lying or "misstatements" are covered by federal perjury laws.

What's the issue?

Off Topic, do you know a Calguns user with the screen name "SoCalEnthusiast"?

I still hate the Gun Control Act of 1968 and wish its repeal.

Stiff penalties for violent crimes is still a much better deterrent than lifetime "gun prohibition".

[-hanko]

Stiff penalties for violent crimes is still a much better deterrent than lifetime "gun prohibition".

As was posted, lifetime gun prohibition is part of the sentence.

[furyous68]

Did you bother to look up what he was convicted of? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/u...ley-texas.html. You don't get a DD or BCD for disrespect. A conviction at a General Court Martial carries the same weight as a Federal felony conviction. I have zero problems with that. And I don't want that doucheweasel Bo Bergdahl to be armed either.

I agree with this.

[meno377]

I agree with this.

You need to inform us about the source regarding your signature. One deserves such recognition for showing their wisdom.

[R Dale]

I don't think even convicted felons should be barred from gun ownership for life provided they satisfactorily served their sentence in full and are lawfully released into society. If their crimes were heinous enough, they should never be released anyway. Perhaps, that military man should have been put away in Leavenworth for life given the heinous acts on his wife and that little boy. I personally hate people who abuse animals like that man did by hitting an innocent dog in the head.

I believe when you are done doing your time in jail, you should get your guns and horses back the way it was in the Old West.

I agree.