Whenever they start with "I respect the 2nd Amendment"... you know whatever comes next will be pure BS
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply from Kamala Harris
Collapse
X
-
Proud CGN Contributor
USMC Pistol Team Alumni - Distinguished Pistol Shot
Owner of multiple Constitutionally protected tools -
Amen on the aboveComment
-
Yeah and shes got those googly crazy eyes. She dont give a crap about CA citizens! She cares about POWER and the disarmament of honest law abiding citizens.
I mean, she said that shes worried about the wrong person getting a CCW? Seriously? Like who? A person who will NEVER apply for one because they dont give a **** about gun laws in the first place?? lmao!! I cannot understand how people cannot see through her BS
I am left leaning when it comes to politics but I am no liberal! The harm the neo liberalism has done to this country and world is beyond belief. Neo Libs are really just fascists in disguiseA note to the NSA or anyone gathering information on me, this disclaimer is for you..."Everything I type on this website Is purely fictional and for entertainment purposes only. None of it is true."
Also, sometimes I type in CAPS to emphasize a POINT. Please dont interpret that as YELLING. Sorry if I HURT any fuzzy little bunny's FEELINGS out there.Comment
-
Sounds like she if fine with it since every CCW permitting agency already does a basic background check for felony convictions, right?
At least high profile violent felonies, right?DOES PEPPER SPRAY WORK? AFTER REPEATED POINT BLANK SHOTS TO THE FACE...OVER A SIMPLE WORKPLACE DISAGREEMENT??? you decide, and you will laught, too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn9YdML8PPwComment
-
Having been thru the process there is no way you will get a permit with a felony in my county. They ask a lot of questions that can get you booted with out a conviction. It is a pretty serious process. She knows it> The DOJ she ran was in charge of those checks. She smiles, pats us on the head while she tells us it's all good. At the same time she is stealing our rights from us and advancing her own agenda.Comment
-
Yeah she is going lose big when it becomes known that she was Willie Brown's blow up doll.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
It would be interesting to know how she paid for the expensive world travel. Anyone know any of the details?Comment
-
My dad used to tell me that the best part of banging your head against a wall is when you stop. It also applies to trying to discuss issues in an intelligent manner with leftist morons like Harris.
Remember, tyrants don't care. They want to rule and control you. If gun ownership made society safer, she'd be even more opposed to firearm ownership. Last thing tyrants want is a safe society. They feed on fear.NRA Life Member since 1990
They're not liberals, they're leftists. Please don't use the former for the latter. Liberals are Locke, Jefferson, Burke, Hayek. Leftists are progressives, Prussian state-socialists, fascists. Liberals stand against the state and unequivocally support liberty. Leftists support state tyranny.

Comment
-
Silly me, thought that Loretta sanchez would be an embarrassment in the congress. kammie harris has taken the cake.
Most people here wanted to vote kammie into the congress to get her out of Kalif, getting her out now will be impossible. Sanchez would of been a better choice.Last edited by Garand1911; 07-13-2017, 1:49 AM."I saved your life, AND brought you pizza" -- MeComment
-
"We must put safeguards in place to that a concealed carry permit does not end up in the hands of an individual not legally allowed to own a firearm"
I don't know guys, it sounds like shes worried that prohibited persons are out to steal our permits. Whats next, having to have a lock on permits? Perhaps keep them in a safe? Is this Liberal Logic that a prohibited person won't carry a gun without a permit thus making the world safer?^^^The above is just an opinion.
NRA Patron Member
CRPA 5 yr Member
"...which from their verbosity, their endless tautologies, their involutions of case within case, and parenthesis within parenthesis, and their multiplied efforts at certainty by saids and aforesaids, by ors and by ands, to make them more plain, do really render them more perplexed and incomprehensible, not only to common readers, but to lawyers themselves. " - Thomas JeffersonComment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,858,111
Posts: 25,040,234
Members: 354,530
Active Members: 5,916
Welcome to our newest member, Boocatini.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 3760 users online. 108 members and 3652 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 8:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

Comment