Since the antis couldn't snooker the politicians into their claims regarding firearms like the Armitrix .22, they are back at it again, going fro broke:
"One of the bills (S816) would have required gun retailers to stock "smart guns," that incorporate technology allowing only the gun owner or authorized user to fire the weapon"
And:
"The "smart gun" bill is the outgrowth of a law that has been on the books since 2002 which requires the use of smart gun technology in all guns sold in state. The new bill altered that law, instead requiring retailers simply to stock the "smart guns.""
Since they figured out that they couldn't get the WHOLE pie, they are going for half of it now ("This bill repeals sections of law prohibiting the sale of all handguns after personalized handguns are available for retail purposes") and will no doubt 'update' the legislation later to what they REALLY want which is a ban on ALL handguns (and long guns too?) which are NOT 'personalized'.
"One of the bills (S816) would have required gun retailers to stock "smart guns," that incorporate technology allowing only the gun owner or authorized user to fire the weapon"
And:
"The "smart gun" bill is the outgrowth of a law that has been on the books since 2002 which requires the use of smart gun technology in all guns sold in state. The new bill altered that law, instead requiring retailers simply to stock the "smart guns.""
Since they figured out that they couldn't get the WHOLE pie, they are going for half of it now ("This bill repeals sections of law prohibiting the sale of all handguns after personalized handguns are available for retail purposes") and will no doubt 'update' the legislation later to what they REALLY want which is a ban on ALL handguns (and long guns too?) which are NOT 'personalized'.
Comment