Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

What other legally purchased property cannot be passed on to your child after death?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mt4design
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 683

    What other legally purchased property cannot be passed on to your child after death?

    I'm doing some research on natural rights and the tyranny behind these new laws.

    Specifically, what other natural right affirmed in the constitution requires one to:

    • Get a background check before exercising that right
    • Register a purchased project in a database based on a subjective list of features on that product
    • Forbid the transfer of legally owned, legally purchased, private property to your children at the time of your death

    I'm sure there are more instances where incremental infringement on the 2nd Amendment has seriously degraded it.

    Are there any other natural rights affirmed that might carry such "common sense" restrictions/regulations?

    If yes, what are they?

    Thanks!
    sigpic

    This is the USA. We don't elect kings, we rebel against them!
  • #2
    Jimi Jah
    I need a LIFE!!
    • Jan 2014
    • 17786

    All of it under inheritance taxes. It's not enough you paid taxes when living...

    Comment

    • #3
      mt4design
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 683

      Originally posted by Jimi Jah
      All of it under inheritance taxes. It's not enough you paid taxes when living...
      True. But, taxes aren't quite the same in that your children or your heir will still receive a portion of what ever is left after the government steals from you.

      The $$$ wont be destroyed or confiscated by the government for destruction, the wealth is said to be redistributed.

      With AW law, your legally purchased property cannot be handed down to your children or other heir. It cannot be sold upon your death.

      IMHO, it is the epitome of tyranny and clearly unconstitutional.
      sigpic

      This is the USA. We don't elect kings, we rebel against them!

      Comment

      • #4
        mt4design
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 683

        lol, I was looking at the California Constitution which begins,

        "CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
        ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS


        SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
        inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
        liberty
        , acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
        and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy."
        sigpic

        This is the USA. We don't elect kings, we rebel against them!

        Comment

        • #5
          Untamed1972
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Mar 2009
          • 17579

          Originally posted by mt4design
          True. But, taxes aren't quite the same in that your children or your heir will still receive a portion of what ever is left after the government steals from you.

          The $$$ wont be destroyed or confiscated by the government for destruction, the wealth is said to be redistributed.

          With AW law, your legally purchased property cannot be handed down to your children or other heir. It cannot be sold upon your death.

          IMHO, it is the epitome of tyranny and clearly unconstitutional.
          That's not exactly true. Under current law the family has 90 days to surrender it or remove it from the state. That's how they're covering their arse, but giving you the option to remove/sell it out of state. Even though the cost of doing so may exceed the value of the firearm. They can claim "we didn't take anything."
          "Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

          Quote for the day:
          "..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun

          Comment

          • #6
            mt4design
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 683

            Originally posted by Untamed1972
            That's not exactly true. Under current law the family has 90 days to surrender it or remove it from the state. That's how they're covering their arse, but giving you the option to remove/sell it out of state. Even though the cost of doing so may exceed the value of the firearm. They can claim "we didn't take anything."
            Which goes back to my original question.

            Is there any other affirmed civil right that would require that legally purchased property be surrendered upon the death of an individual and forbids the transfer of that property to an heir?
            sigpic

            This is the USA. We don't elect kings, we rebel against them!

            Comment

            • #7
              guntrust
              CGN/CGSSA Contributor
              CGN Contributor
              • Jun 2009
              • 790

              Originally posted by mt4design
              Which goes back to my original question.

              Is there any other affirmed civil right that would require that legally purchased property be surrendered upon the death of an individual and forbids the transfer of that property to an heir?
              You can remove it from the state, but still maintain control over it--even after death.
              David R Duringer JD LL.M (Tax), CA/WA/TX atty
              CRPA Mag Must Retract Erroneous Bulletin Slamming Gun Trusts
              Radio ads: http://Protect.FM
              FREE training: http://guntrust.org
              FREE design meeting: http://Protect.LIFE

              Comment

              • #8
                Don Vito
                Member
                • Feb 2009
                • 317

                Originally posted by mt4design
                lol, I was looking at the California Constitution which begins,

                "CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
                ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS


                SECTION 1. All people are by nature free and independent and have
                inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and
                liberty
                , acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing
                and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy."
                Wow they just **** all over that
                Originally posted by gesundheit
                Don Vito made an offer than Knauga could not refuse

                Comment

                • #9
                  Epaphroditus
                  Veteran Member
                  • Sep 2013
                  • 4888

                  You do have to register to vote.
                  CA firearms laws timeline BLM land maps

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    wireless
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2010
                    • 4346

                    Originally posted by mt4design
                    Which goes back to my original question.

                    Is there any other affirmed civil right that would require that legally purchased property be surrendered upon the death of an individual and forbids the transfer of that property to an heir?
                    Controlled substances have to be disposed of or surrendered.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      LowThudd
                      Veteran Member
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 3608

                      Ivory, also cannot be passed down, or transfered in the state. Even if it was legally imported previous to the ban. That was last year. Now, they can say "See, it's just like how we treat Ivory pianos". lol

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        boltstop
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2007
                        • 927

                        Controlled substances are not legal to acquire for personal use (not even by a doctor) so that argument doesn't work.

                        My rifles were acquired perfectly legally by me in the state of California. There was no little sticker or whatever on them at the time of purchase telling me that I could not pass them on to my daughters upon my death. Telling my estate that the guns must be removed from the state is an undue burden since all three of them live in California and have no residences outside the state. Being forced to move out of the state or purchase a residence out of the state simply to take possession of property is an undue burden.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        UA-8071174-1