Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Nice Tim Lee Article on National Review - Inconvenient Truth

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • not-fishing
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 2270

    Nice Tim Lee Article on National Review - Inconvenient Truth

    In a free society, particularly one whose Constitution explicitly protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, the burden of proof remains upon those who seek to run other people's lives, restrict their choices or infringe upon their right to defend themselves and their families as they choose. And in this debate, those who seek to restrict Second Amendment rights haven't come anywhere close to meeting that burden of proof.


    First, let's start with such people's most frequent agenda item - that so-called "assault weapons" be outlawed. In addition to the well-established fact that "assault weapon" is impossible to categorize with any accuracy or practicality, they forget that we already tried federal "assault weapon" legislation between 1994 and 2004. And guess what? After it expired in 2004, the U.S. murder rate continued to decline.

    Second, and interrelated with the first point, the simple fact is that murder by "assault weapon" in the U.S. is exceedingly rare. According to the FBI itself, rifles of any type (of which "assault rifles" are a small subcategory) accounted for less than 3% of U.S. murders in 2014. That was half the number of murders using hands or feet (6%), and far fewer than the number of murders committed using knives (13%).

    Third, let's dispense with the myth that the U.S. suffers a high murder rate compared to other countries, including the many that flatly prohibit firearm possession. According to the latest figures, the U.S. suffers approximately 4.5 murders per 100,000 people, far below the worldwide average of approximately 11 per 100,000 people. Although Second Amendment antagonists deceptively compare the U.S. rate to European counterparts, that's like saying that someone is twice as likely to die of a lightning strike in Minnesota as in Montana. In other words, it's extraordinarily rare in either case, not to mention the fact that murders in cities like Chicago, Washington, D.C., or Detroit that restrict gun possession account for an enormous portion of overall U.S. murders.

    Fourth, the U.S. murder rate has plummeted by 50% since 1990, during the same period in which the number of firearms in the U.S. has skyrocketed, as did the number of individual states relaxing their firearms possession restrictions. That inconvenient fact was perhaps best summarized by a headline from the left-leaning Pew Research Center entitled, "Gun Homicide Rate Down 49% Since 1993 Peak, Public Unaware."

    Fifth, claims from Obama or other leftists that the U.S. suffers the world's highest mass shooting rate - their attempt to isolate "assault weapons" in particular - are also false. Among the 18 nations of Europe and North America, the U.S. is actually 12th, behind France, Norway, Switzerland, Finland and other supposedly more "enlightened" nations.

    Sixth, more than twice as many people were murdered in last November's Paris attacks by an "assault weapon" than the number killed in Orlando, even though France officially prohibits their possession. The same is true of Norway, where Anders Breivik methodically slaughtered 77 people using a firearm prohibited under its laws.
    There is more to the article.

    I've be using "Inconvenient Truth" now for years to upset and troll Al Gore Progressives. It's always good to throw their own terms against them in "discussions".
    Spreading the WORD according to COLT. and Smith, Wesson, Ruger, HK, Sig, High Standard, Browning
Working...
UA-8071174-1