Tweet
So let's see....I'm not going to vote for they guy on my side of the issue because he has ugly hair, is richer / more successful then me, and can't really get done what I want him too....so instead I'd vote for some idiot from New Mexico who's going to get 1.1% of the national vote....yeah that will fix everything!
-
No.
It's because his track record shows he cannot be trusted on anything. He's the biggest liar in the entire current race. This man praised the Chinese and the North Koreans on how successful they were at smacking down protests and eliminating opponents.
I don't believe anything this man says. Including anything he says about guns.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
Don't you see...
Like I said click around. All calguns members can do is complain about candidates that would actually protect their gun rights or at least say they will....where as the opposition that is favored to win openly claims the NRA an enemy and guns something to be controlled. They'd waste their vote on some clown from New Mexico that won't get 1.2% of the national vote.
Comment
-
I really get a kick out of the give and take on this kind of thread...The fact is that not one person knows what any of the GOP potential candidates would be like...not one...but everyone knows what Hillary would do...it's either going to be Hillary or the "nominated GOP candidate" no matter what people think..not one candidate running "third party" can even get one electoral vote (Ron Paul was a good example...so was Perot)...Trump is absolutely unknown but I'd rather trust him than a known politician like most of the other GOP candidates...they are a given and known entity...with a track record in politics......whatever the situation my vote is absolutely no on any Democrat...call it a revenge vote or whatever..the Left has proved itself to be destroyers of our Country.God and the Constitution give me my rights and actions...any other input is just blabbering.Comment
-
Of course nobody knows exactly what the given GOP candidate would do? Do you enjoy stating the obvious? And it's equally obvious that Hitlery has a specific *track record* that allows a reasonable assessment of what she'd do and an equally reasonable assessment of her potential for egregious behavior based on past performance , not to mention the fact that her wife " Bill" has already been president. Care to open the case lot of cans of worms surrounding the Clintons? Including Billy-boys latest shenanigans in internal affairs in the Haitan government , along with the dumping of subsidised Arkansas rice into said countries economies? Or should we ratchet back a ways and bring up Whitewater again? Or events at a small Arkansas airport i.e. various events in and around Mena? Perhaps more recent events would be more to your liking? Benghazi perhaps?
Quit attempting to throw up a blind to disguise the " lesser of two evils" nature of the upcoming election. Because Hitlery is quite certainly the GREATER of the available evils.
And kindly leave the dwarf megalomaniac known as Perot out of it , likewise the FAKE Libertarian Ron Paul , just because the latter can spout rehashed Murray Rothbard and Lysander Spooner quotes at a public that isn't familar enough with TRUE Libertarianism to recognise said rhetoric doesn't remotely qualify him as a Libertarian. Mention of those two is nothing more than a blind , an attempted smoke-screen to distract from the REAL issues.
Again..............it's a lesser of two evils choice , what candidate will take away LESS of your basic rights and Freedoms , dig into your pocket LESS deeply and erode the Constitution and Bill of Rights LESS during their tenure in the oval office.
You indicate that you may trust Trump.........*NO* politician is trustworthy. None. Zip.Zer0..............perhaps when the 50 thousand or so Lobbyists inside the Beltway are prevented from hurling filthy lucre into the Corrupt HogTrough that is D.C. there may come along a trustworthy politico. Until then it's just which one you trust to do the LEAST damage.
And yes this time it may well be Trump or Cruz.Last edited by Freethought; 01-17-2016, 5:36 PM.Comment
-
Donald Trump does not go through life wanting to look like a fool. He is very arrogant and wants everyone to love him. He will most likely do his best to accomplish what he promises. He can't stand the humiliation of the press and those that vote for him to badmouth him on a regular basis. His pride won't allow it. Yes, he speak rashly sometimes, but he will most likely try to get the job done as he says he will.Comment
-
I keep up with all the threads... I'm very familiar with the complaints about Trump... Hair, more successful and not doing what people want are way off base.
I was being litteral about your specific words, when I asked where you are getting that from. Everything you've posted since then doesn't even address the post I was asking about."Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. TrumpComment
-
one of those
If you want to take posts on a forum some kind of "literal" like a guy in AZ that shoots congressman does then ignore me. I don't do "literal" libertarian BS and find it disgusting - I'll do you the favor of ignoring you. Such people I find to be dangerous and not relevant to discussion. bye bye
Comment
-
^^^ very bizarre"Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. TrumpComment
There are currently 4448 users online. 71 members and 4377 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment