For mag-locked configuration where a device is used to separate the upper and lower, does the device need to be DOJ approved or any device is good to go as long as it functions per code requirements?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mag locking device
Collapse
X
-
The DOJ does not approve such devices, period. They do not offer written opinions on the legality of such devices. They have acknowledged that some older mag-lock devices are compliant in court testimony, that is the best we get. And I think those were all mag-lock 1.0, not the current requirement.
It is up to each person, with or without advice from their own legal counsel, to evaluate their firearm and decide if it complies or not.Last edited by SkyHawk; 05-06-2020, 9:36 PM. -
Fair enough. Thank you for your quick reply.The DOJ does not approve such devices, period. They do not offer written opinions on the legality of such devices. They have acknowledged that some are compliant in court testimony, that is the best we get.
It is up to each person, with or without advice from their legal counsel, to evaluate their firearm and decide if it complies or not.sigpicComment
-
kingpin rocksComment
-
-
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,867,591
Posts: 25,138,221
Members: 358,387
Active Members: 5,669
Welcome to our newest member, LakeLife.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 18418 users online. 117 members and 18301 guests.
Most users ever online was 239,041 at 10:39 PM on 02-14-2026.


Comment