AR Fixed mag options - Minimum separation of upper and lower

[BAJ475]

[Califpatriot]

It's been discussed ad nauseum. I don't know this particular firm's exact reasoning, but having reviewed the statute and regs closely, I certainly agree with their conclusion. I think the kingpin/armaglock and juggernaut tactical hell fighter place you in jeopardy because the action is not necessarily interrupted, thereby not constituting disassembly.

Mind posting the opinion?

[Califpatriot]

https://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1466998

[BAJ475]

It's been discussed ad nauseum. I don't know this particular firm's exact reasoning, but having reviewed the statute and regs closely, I certainly agree with their conclusion. I think the kingpin/armaglock and juggernaut tactical hell fighter place you in jeopardy because the action is not necessarily interrupted, thereby not constituting disassembly.

Mind posting the opinion?

Thanks for the link. I assumed that it had probably been discussed, just did not know which search terms to use.

The link is https://crossarmory.com/some-ar-15-r...not-compliant/

We are in agreement. Other than those systems that remove the rear pin, there is simply too much uncertainty for me. I will probably just take my lowers to Idaho and build true fully banned CA assault weapons (No BBs) with 30 round mags and maybe a suppressor.

[Califpatriot]

Yep. I think they're right on. Not sure if a competitor paid them to write it, but doesn't change the fact their logic is solid.