Correct.
Fed law requires that interstate go through an FFL *and* comply with the laws of both involved states.
California law requires that an in-state FFL be involved if the recipient is a CA resident.
California DROS software is &^%$ed up and won't accept an out of state ID for the "Seller" entry on a PPT, thus forcing the transation to be entered as an FFL transfer.
Fed law requires that interstate go through an FFL *and* comply with the laws of both involved states.
California law requires that an in-state FFL be involved if the recipient is a CA resident.
California DROS software is &^%$ed up and won't accept an out of state ID for the "Seller" entry on a PPT, thus forcing the transation to be entered as an FFL transfer.
Comment