Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Adjustable AR-15 Stock and the CA LAW?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • eXcision
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 205

    Adjustable AR-15 Stock and the CA LAW?

    Hey guys, So I've been looking into this whole "Scary Features" thing that's going on and I decided that I would be going the locked magazine route for the 3 AR-15's I'm currently building (There's some really good ways around this and I don't want featureless).

    Since I'm going this route, Then I can have an adjustable stock right? The reason I ask this is because there's been a couple of websites that just outright refuse to ship them to California... I found some websites that do ship them, But am I missing something? Are they illegal or are these websites just taking the safe side?
  • #2
    Quiet
    retired Goon
    • Mar 2007
    • 30241

    Folding/telescoping shoulder stock are restricted on semi-auto centerfire rifles that do not have a fixed magazine. [PC 30515(a)(1)(C)]

    Therefore...

    They are CA legal on semi-auto centerfire rifles with a fixed 10 round magazine, manually operated (bolt-action, lever-action, pump-action, single-shot) rifles, and rimfire rifles.
    sigpic

    "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

    Comment

    • #3
      RickD427
      CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Jan 2007
      • 9259

      Originally posted by eXcision
      Hey guys, So I've been looking into this whole "Scary Features" thing that's going on and I decided that I would be going the locked magazine route for the 3 AR-15's I'm currently building (There's some really good ways around this and I don't want featureless).

      Since I'm going this route, Then I can have an adjustable stock right? The reason I ask this is because there's been a couple of websites that just outright refuse to ship them to California... I found some websites that do ship them, But am I missing something? Are they illegal or are these websites just taking the safe side?
      With a proper fixed magazine, you're just fine with an adjustable stock, or a collapsible stock.

      Just make sure that your fixed magazine meets the requirements of PC 30315(b). A "Bullet Button" is no longer adequate. It's arguable whether the "Maglock" type devices will work. The law requires that "Disassembly" of the action is required in order to remove the magazine. If you accept the maker's argument that "opening" the action is the same as "disassembling" the action, then the Maglock works just fine.

      A lot of vendors will decline to ship items to California because of their fear of legal action, confusion of the applicability of our laws, or because they don't want the hassle of dealing with California. That's their right. It's a business decision that they get to make. Just don't be accepting of their often-offered explanation that "it's illegal." But that don't change the bottom line, you're still not gonna get their stuff.
      If you build a man a fire, you'll keep him warm for the evening. If you set a man on fire, you'll keep him warm for the rest of his life.

      Comment

      • #4
        eXcision
        Member
        • May 2010
        • 205

        Originally posted by RickD427
        With a proper fixed magazine, you're just fine with an adjustable stock, or a collapsible stock.

        Just make sure that your fixed magazine meets the requirements of PC 30315(b). A "Bullet Button" is no longer adequate. It's arguable whether the "Maglock" type devices will work. The law requires that "Disassembly" of the action is required in order to remove the magazine. If you accept the maker's argument that "opening" the action is the same as "disassembling" the action, then the Maglock works just fine.

        A lot of vendors will decline to ship items to California because of their fear of legal action, confusion of the applicability of our laws, or because they don't want the hassle of dealing with California. That's their right. It's a business decision that they get to make. Just don't be accepting of their often-offered explanation that "it's illegal." But that don't change the bottom line, you're still not gonna get their stuff.
        Understood clearly. I never asked for them to ship it, They have an automated system that doesn't allow it, I just change to a different store when that happens lol !

        Thanks.

        Comment

        • #5
          tnlrat37
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 2166

          "People sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."

          Comment

          • #6
            eXcision
            Member
            • May 2010
            • 205

            I have the Mean Arms loader, Which is essentially the same thing as the BF-10, However Cross Armory makes a badass quick release and mag release (2 items that paired together make for fast California Compliant reloading)



            and

            Comment

            • #7
              solidfreshdope
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2016
              • 808

              You can have them with a fixed mag under the new definition. I understand your struggle. A few websites refused to ship me a muzzle brake for my featureless build.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
              Welcome to the United Snakes.

              Comment

              • #8
                Jimi Jah
                I need a LIFE!!
                • Jan 2014
                • 17954

                Keeping that damn bullet button on was the deal breaker for me here. I do love the featureless Magpul fixed carbine stock, the linear compensators and that wonderful feeling Sparrow grip.

                I doubt I'd go back even if that old stuff was legal here.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Blade Gunner
                  Veteran Member
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 4422

                  Originally posted by Jimi Jah
                  Keeping that damn bullet button on was the deal breaker for me here. I do love the featureless Magpul fixed carbine stock, the linear compensators and that wonderful feeling Sparrow grip.

                  I doubt I'd go back even if that old stuffed was legal here.
                  If you find yourself in a fair fight, you're doing it all wrong.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Jimi Jah
                    I need a LIFE!!
                    • Jan 2014
                    • 17954

                    My featureless looks good and feels good, I'm very used to it now. I was going to take some pistol grips with me out of state but now I'll just leave the Sparrow's on. At least I don't look like a California geek with paddles on his rifle.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1