...

[Armytop]

...

[Mr Steve]

https://justthenews.com/video/newsom-high-capacity-gun-magazine-ban-ruling

[9Cal_OC]

Ha “privilege”. Then tried to correct by saying “right”.

[Mr Steve]

when he says "the gun requires a dangerous and deadly component" i was thinking, a dangerous person. he then says "a bullet", i should have known better doh!

although, you can still kill someone with a gun without any bullets. still requires the person, in both cases.

[NATEWA]

[Mr Steve]

in all of his dickslexic rambling he really didnt say much about it except theyre going to review their next steps.

[9Cal_OC]

when he says "the gun requires a dangerous and deadly component" i was thinking, a dangerous person. he then says "a bullet", i should have known better doh!

although, you can still kill someone with a gun without any bullets. still requires the person, in both cases.

I was thinking the same thing too! But that would be solved by his extensive backgrounds he mentioned. Hence, ammo is moot. But no...

[dfletcher]

Not exactly - he called it a "privilege slash right" meaning he doesn't consider it a right.

Whenever someone references a majority vote, such as he did regarding Prop 63, as a justification for trampling on rights I wonder why he doesn't apply that logic to Prop 8 or Prop 187. Nor does he wonder what would have happened had civil rights been put to a simple majority vote in several southern states (and many others) until not so long ago.

[Scratch705]

can we use his words against him, since he said that guns are not the problem, it is only ammo and magazines.

so the handgun roster should be struck down. since it isn't the gun that is dangerous. AW laws should be struck down, since having a pistol grip means nothing without ammo and magazines.

[The War Wagon]

Biden-speak for "WAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!! I'm not getting MY way!!!"