2nd Amendment Case for Open Carry Going to Trial

[donhamrick]

American Common Defence Review




I am the Unrepresented Plaintiff in HAMRICK v. PRESIDENT BUSH, et al, U.S. District Court/DC, No. 03-2160, RICO Act case for the Second Amendment. Dismissed with prejudice; Appealed, DC Circuit, No. 04-5316.

ON MAY 18, 2006 MY MOTION FOR REHEARING & REHEARING EN BANC DISPUTING DISMISSAL OF RICO CLAIMS WAS DENIED. HOWEVER CASE IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON SECOND AMENDMENT GROUNDS. Case is for National Open Carry Handgun. NRA refuses to help.

My case needs your donations! Please visit my blog above and its archives to learn that my case is real and every bit the case the NRA dreamed for but now avoids because of its open carry trait conflicts with their concealed carry agenda.

Signed: Don Hamrick

[Turbinator]

Calguns readers, thoughts??

Turby

[bwiese]

NRA-backed lawers won't help - they didn't take his case because they thought it wouldn't be a winner and that a possible loss would set things back.

I am sure this guy is a good guy and well-intentioned. But we're gonna end up with more ill-founded cases - like Kasler and Silviera in California - that either made no forward progress or set things back.

[donhamrick]

I disagree with you. (Naturally). Simply because I am a U.S. Merchant Seaman my case overlaps maritime law, federal laws, and state laws. I can use the U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations against the U.S. Government. I can force the U.S. Government to the negotiating table if things go as I work them.

I can win this if I had help! Donations will help a great deal. Not donating will help prove your self-fulfilling prophecy.

[glen avon]

why didn't your lawyer catch your misspelling of "defense"?

[donhamrick]

Why didn't you scroll down my blog? You would have found the answer to your question.

You are proof that people don't thoroughly read or investigation information before they issue their opinions or questions.

Your answer is here:

http://americancommondefencereview.blogspot.com/2006/05/common-defence-or-national-defense.html#links

[hoffmang]

It might be wise that when filing a broad complaint pro-se that you at least respond with a request for more time to respond to the Government's reply...

Even when the court gave you more time, you didn't file a reply?

[Glasshat]

When are... but how can.... wait, why do....oh forget it.

[glen avon]

Why didn't you scroll down my blog?

because I lost interest the second I saw your misspelling of "defense."

You are proof that people don't thoroughly read or investigation information before they issue their opinions or questions.

Perhaps I might be proof that people don't care to read another non-starter rico claim pro-se I'm a victim big bad NRA won't help me situation?

in a world full of blogs, why should I read yours? why don't you spend some time asking me how I feel about a bunch of stuff that doesn't seem interesting to you?

pro se = loser case

ETA I just wasted 20 minutes looking at your case, you really need an attorney, otherwise you are wasting everybody's time including your own.

[donhamrick]

because I lost interest the second I saw your misspelling of "defense."



Perhaps I might be proof that people don't care to read another non-starter rico claim pro-se I'm a victim big bad NRA won't help me situation?

in a world full of blogs, why should I read yours? why don't you spend some time asking me how I feel about a bunch of stuff that doesn't seem interesting to you?

pro se = loser case

ETA I just wasted 20 minutes looking at your case, you really need an attorney, otherwise you are wasting everybody's time including your own.

Golly gee whiz professor!

I beat the U.S. Government's motion to dismiss alleging "res judicata!" The DC Circuit Court of Appeals did affirm the dismissal of my RICO ACT claim BUT REMANDED MY CASE for further proceedings on Second Amendment grounds.

It isn't a loser case even if you wish it to be. I can win this case.

[donhamrick]

Perhaps this will broaden your horizons on the full scope of the Second Amendment!

The following is part of a motion I will be filing when my case goes to the discovery phase as part and partial offer of settlement. It is BECAUSE I am a U.S. Merchant Seaman that I can use the U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations against the U.S. Government in my favor over my Second Amendment case!

Federal Preemption of State Gun Control Laws

[donhamrick]

Special Procedures under Rule 16(c)(9)
Federal Rules of Civil ProcedureNegotiated Rulemaking With the U.S. Government
Under the United States Code

[donhamrick]

[donhamrick]

[glen avon]

30 more seconds I will never get back....