Hi Guys,
I've done some research with others on our 2014 L.A. county Sheriff candidates.
out of the 7 candidates I only find 2 to be worthy. Stay away from the guys bragging about all their endorsements from the corporate owned mass media outlets and anti gun/anti constitution politicians.
1st- Another thread on here states Paul Tanaka is pro CCW. His answer on Facebook and his website regarding CCW appears to be patronizing to get votes. He does not mention the supreme law, "The Constitution". He only mentions he will follow current color of law, which as we know, is many times unconstitutional. The first and foremost duty of Sheriff is to "Protect and Uphold the constitution" , Our Supreme law, not "color of law" made up by the legislature.
See Pauls website here to see what I'm talking about.
- I believe we somewhat have a choice between Bob Olmsted and Todd Rogers
You'll notice on Bob Olmsteds website he has a debate video. 2 minutes into the video he specifically mentions his first and foremost duty is to protect and uphold the constitution and his "Oath of office".
I also wrote Todd Rogers, this is the response I received back regarding CCW. He also at least shows a picture of the constitution on his website.
"Damian
I believe that self defense is good cause. Under my policy as sheriff, I will issue CCW in a fair and judicious manner. Firstly, I do not believe the issuance of CCWs should be in any way connected to ones political connections. CCWs should be granted without prejudice. That said I will have a strong criteria for issuance that include criminal, mental health and good standing back ground investigations. By good standing I mean if my investigators find inn their investigation that an individual habitually threatens others with deadly force then that person would be denied a CCW permit.
I believe under that standard the vast majority of individuals will be eligible and receive a CCW permit.
I hope that answers your questions and concerns."
Todd
I've done some research with others on our 2014 L.A. county Sheriff candidates.
out of the 7 candidates I only find 2 to be worthy. Stay away from the guys bragging about all their endorsements from the corporate owned mass media outlets and anti gun/anti constitution politicians.
1st- Another thread on here states Paul Tanaka is pro CCW. His answer on Facebook and his website regarding CCW appears to be patronizing to get votes. He does not mention the supreme law, "The Constitution". He only mentions he will follow current color of law, which as we know, is many times unconstitutional. The first and foremost duty of Sheriff is to "Protect and Uphold the constitution" , Our Supreme law, not "color of law" made up by the legislature.
See Pauls website here to see what I'm talking about.
- I believe we somewhat have a choice between Bob Olmsted and Todd Rogers
You'll notice on Bob Olmsteds website he has a debate video. 2 minutes into the video he specifically mentions his first and foremost duty is to protect and uphold the constitution and his "Oath of office".
I also wrote Todd Rogers, this is the response I received back regarding CCW. He also at least shows a picture of the constitution on his website.
"Damian
I believe that self defense is good cause. Under my policy as sheriff, I will issue CCW in a fair and judicious manner. Firstly, I do not believe the issuance of CCWs should be in any way connected to ones political connections. CCWs should be granted without prejudice. That said I will have a strong criteria for issuance that include criminal, mental health and good standing back ground investigations. By good standing I mean if my investigators find inn their investigation that an individual habitually threatens others with deadly force then that person would be denied a CCW permit.
I believe under that standard the vast majority of individuals will be eligible and receive a CCW permit.
I hope that answers your questions and concerns."
Todd

Comment