Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Laws Relating to Targets

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    LOW2000
    CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Jan 2006
    • 941

    The USSS (note Arfcom usage of SSS), are not to be ****ed with.

    From http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa040398.htm :


    What Constitutes a "Threat?"

    According to this law -- 18 USC Sec. 871 -- which reads, in part:

    "...Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."

    That covers a lot of deeds and statements. It gives the Secret Service a lot of latitude when conducting an investigation. There is a very good reason for this. Few jobs are more dangerous than President of the United States.
    Threat or Criticism
    Where is the line drawn? When does a critical remark become a threat? On one extreme is the off-hand comment, the letter to a friend, the email to a co-worker, or message posted in a newsgroup. On the other, the twisted psychotic plot. Clearly, the circumstances of delivery make a great deal of difference. A "letter to the editor", or speech intelligently attacking the President's every action and policy is our right and should never be construed as a physical threat. Screaming obscenities in the President's face, sending threatening mail to the White House, or publicly stating a desire to see the President harmed are not only acts of shameful disrespect, they should always be considered threats under the law.
    All comments are solely for educational purposes and are spoken in a hypothetical manner. The poster follows any and all statutes, codes, mandates, etc to the letter of the law.

    sigpic

    Comment

    • #17
      leitung
      Veteran Member
      • Jun 2008
      • 2897

      I believe for LEO training you cannot use black targets anymore.. other than that... I know nothing..
      Former "Subject" of the People's Republic of California in "exile" in Washington State.

      Comment

      • #18
        yellowfin
        Calguns Addict
        • Nov 2007
        • 8371

        Numerous CCW issuance policies make common citizens into targets.
        "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
        Originally posted by indiandave
        In Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.
        Discretionary Issue is the new Separate but Equal.

        Comment

        • #19
          Shotgun Man
          Veteran Member
          • Oct 2007
          • 4053

          Originally posted by leitung
          I believe for LEO training you cannot use black targets anymore.. other than that... I know nothing..
          "Black targets" what does that mean? Do you mean you cannot have a character target of a black person?

          Comment

          • #20
            c good
            Veteran Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 2556

            LEO targets are no longer allowed to have features distinctive to any particular ethnic group. ie. Fros type of hair. Yes, they used to exist. Just generic featured targets, read: (Caucasian) are now allowed. It won't be long until they have to be characters out of South Park....The Cartoon..not neighborhood I hate P.C. Bologna! c good

            Comment

            Working...
            UA-8071174-1