Torrance. Urgent Request.

[hill billy]

I thought TBJ was done with calguns

Thanks for that insight. I looked and didn't see anywhere where it said TBJ was done, I think BJ made his own statement that he was done. How bout, help if you can and if not keep the disparaging remarks to yourself?

[tgriffin]

I thought TBJ was done with calguns

Oh he is FAR from done with Calguns. Some big things in the works. He is way more than he seems.

[geeknow]

Oh he is FAR from done with Calguns. Some big things in the works. He is way more than he seems.

elaborate please.

[CCWFacts]

All of you should be ashamed of yourselves. Expecting things like logic and sound tracking principles to govern something a government agency. I mean, really.

Hill billy,

Unfortunately, my whole point here is, someone in the DoJ is being logical and made this decision based on logic. Someone wanted and audit-proof system and that's what they got.

It's an absolute no-brainer to serialize paper like that. It's done for all kinds of documents which are far less important than CCWs. It's been done for over 100 years with everything from birth certificates to stock certificates to ID cards, permits, licenses. But, somehow, CCWs don't have it?

[hill billy]

Hill billy,

Unfortunately, my whole point here is, someone in the DoJ is being logical and made this decision based on logic. Someone wanted and audit-proof system and that's what they got.

It's an absolute no-brainer to serialize paper like that. It's done for all kinds of documents which are far less important than CCWs. It's been done for over 100 years with everything from birth certificates to stock certificates to ID cards, permits, licenses. But, somehow, CCWs don't have it?

I knew what you meant, it's pretty amazing the difference between a Ca ccw and say, a Utah one.
It's like they've planned to fail all along.

[Glock22Fan]

elaborate please.

One member of TBJ, admittedly a key member() is no longer posting. However, TBJ's presence is still here on this board, particularly with me (who you may regard as a primary contact point).

We are still interested in working towards fairness and legality of CCW issue, demanding that chiefs and sheriffs who abuse their discretion stop so doing.

We have, as many know, two existing lawsuits. We have a number of others in the early stages. Some of these should result in lawsuits, some of them won't (we reject a large number of people who want us to work with them because we cannot accept the possibilility of failure at this point). Some of the areas that are likely to get targetted include a city in, and possibly the county of, San Diego, San Jose and two more Los Angeles cities, including the biggie.

We are averaging three to four serious enquiries a day at present. Plus, of course, several other queries of great, or lesser, import, many of which can be answered by simply sending a link to our FAQ page (http://www.californiaconcealedcarry.com/faq.html).