What does SB-567 mean

[OCArmory]

So what does SB-567 mean. It takes designed to be fired from the shoulder away but exempts handgun. Does this mean the judge will be OK? I am trying to think if anything I have would be required to register under this new law and can't come up with any examples. Thanks for everyone's help.
Mike

[jonc]

GOOD QUESTION MIKE!!!!

ANYONE?

[WiKDMoNKY]

Saiga 12's and 1919's become AWs?

[OCArmory]

Definitely not 1919's unless yours is a 12ga in which case call me because that would be rad. Maybe saigas but they don't have a revolving cylinder.

[jonc]

mike ,
got any gas pistons in stock?

[OCArmory]

Nope. I can't believe nobody has an opinion on this

[sevendayweekend]

arent saiga shotguns already a ca aw? (without mag lock of course)

[OCArmory]

Yes they will be but that is under a different law. Basically i am wondering if I have to register my AOW's as an AW

[ke6guj]

the main thing this does is redefine those Circuit Judge .45/410 revolving-cylinder rifles (they are rifles due to the rifled bore and not a shotgun) into revolving-cylinder shotguns, which then fall under existing shotgun AW rules.

because of that change in classification, they are opening up a registration period for them.

I think it might also those AOW Judge pistols into AWs. Originally, the Judge was a CA-defined SBS but was not a CA-defined shotgun. since it wasn't a shotgun, it did not violate any shotgun AW rules. So, as long as it was registered as an AOW, it was exempt from the CA-SBS regs.

And lastly, there were some people that were talking about stuff like Saiga-12 PG-only "crusers" not being shotgunsif they didn't have a shoulder stock and didn't meet the definition of a shotgun so they could have detachable magazines and not be a shotgun AW.