-favored outlawing abortion, would difi and babs boxer support it?
-favored regulating the press, would the ACLU and the media go along with it?
-favored random police searches on anyone suspected of possible or potential wrongdoing, would that make it acceptable?
-favored putting the burden of proof on the accused (as in other nations), would that make it acceptable?
-favored racial profiling (let's be honest, crime stats are what they are) would that mean it's ok?
-favored internment of people's thought to be a threat (oops, already happened!!) does that justify it?
-favored an official state religion (or prohibiting one that doesn't agree with current, politically correct trends) make it legal or right?
please feel to add to the list, but try this with the lefties and anti-gunners. yes, the 90% thing was utter BS, a fictitious number made up out of thin air by the most mendacious president in history (and that's saying something!!). even if true, it still doesn't matter.
if 1%, .01%, hell even if I'm the only person in the entire country that wants to worship a tire iron as my supreme diety, freedom of religion still prevails. and THAT WAS THE POINT of the constitution, to protect the minority from the will of the majority. or more specifically, to protect the individual from the democratic will of the people.
rights are not subject to popular will. popular will does not supersede rights. so, the next time one of those idiots rambles off about 90%, ask them if speech or religion, or privacy, is subject to a 90% referendum.
-favored regulating the press, would the ACLU and the media go along with it?
-favored random police searches on anyone suspected of possible or potential wrongdoing, would that make it acceptable?
-favored putting the burden of proof on the accused (as in other nations), would that make it acceptable?
-favored racial profiling (let's be honest, crime stats are what they are) would that mean it's ok?
-favored internment of people's thought to be a threat (oops, already happened!!) does that justify it?
-favored an official state religion (or prohibiting one that doesn't agree with current, politically correct trends) make it legal or right?
please feel to add to the list, but try this with the lefties and anti-gunners. yes, the 90% thing was utter BS, a fictitious number made up out of thin air by the most mendacious president in history (and that's saying something!!). even if true, it still doesn't matter.
if 1%, .01%, hell even if I'm the only person in the entire country that wants to worship a tire iron as my supreme diety, freedom of religion still prevails. and THAT WAS THE POINT of the constitution, to protect the minority from the will of the majority. or more specifically, to protect the individual from the democratic will of the people.
rights are not subject to popular will. popular will does not supersede rights. so, the next time one of those idiots rambles off about 90%, ask them if speech or religion, or privacy, is subject to a 90% referendum.


Comment