Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Senate Vote to Move Firearms Bill Forward CSPAN-2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    DEVOREGUNNER
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 418

    Well all of the phone calls, faxes and e-mails worked well didn't they!! Bastards.

    Comment

    • #62
      ngiotta
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2011
      • 90

      Originally posted by Luieburger
      ....We can't win if we eat each other alive here...
      This.
      UltraNick.
      Enterprise web development and design.

      Comment

      • #63
        Legasat
        Intergalactic Member
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Mar 2009
        • 4151

        How can Senator Richard Burr from NC be on both lists? Voted for and against the filibuster did he?
        ..

        .........STGC(SW)


        SAF Life Member

        sigpic
        NRA Benefactor

        Comment

        • #64
          Kopis
          Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 450

          They're back on C2.

          Comment

          • #65
            majtom94
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2012
            • 1120

            Originally posted by ant21b
            The awb and magazine ban are not going to pass so why all the concern. The house will not pass it if it has those provisions. Lets see what the senate sends to the house if anything before worrying. Background checks will only affect gun shows according to news reports.
            Bhaaaa!!!!
            "Do Democrats even realize that they are making more people buy more guns?"

            NRA Member
            NAGR Member
            CGF Member
            GOA Member

            Comment

            • #66
              webster-dl
              Member
              • May 2011
              • 308

              I have a question: has anyone who got their gun rights suspended or got their guns confiscated for mental health reasons ever sued a medical practitioner for malpractice/slander for unlawfully disclosing their classified medical information improperly? Meaning someone who has no history of violence or violence-prone psychiatric conditions?

              Meaning: someone with obsessive compulsive personality seeks mental health care and the cops confiscate their guns and suspend their gun rights. Has such a person ever brought a malpractice suit? If they won such a suit, I'll tell you all those medical people will think three times before inappropriately disclosing any information.

              Comment

              • #67
                Meplat
                Calguns Addict
                • Jul 2008
                • 6903

                Originally posted by Hoooper
                "we have to pass it so we can find out what is in it" hope they learned their lesson from last time...
                They did. It worked beautifully. Oh wait!! You meant our side.
                sigpicTake not lightly liberty
                To have it you must live it
                And like love, don't you see
                To keep it you must give it

                "I will talk with you no more.
                I will go now, and fight you."
                (Red Cloud)

                Comment

                • #68
                  RonnieP
                  Veteran Member
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 2750

                  Originally posted by Tyrone
                  68-31 in favor
                  R - McCain, Graham, Ayotte, Toomey, Coburn, Burr, Alexander, Heller, Wicker, Kirk, Corker, Isakson, Hoeven, Flake, Collins, were ayes
                  **** YOU and **** all the other traitors.
                  Trump 2016

                  Comment

                  • #69
                    RonnieP
                    Veteran Member
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 2750

                    It's not just Toomey, All the ****ing rinos need to be Primary.
                    Trump 2016

                    Comment

                    • #70
                      Meplat
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 6903

                      I knew this was coming when folks on our side started screaming 'nut control, not gun control'.



                      Originally posted by ScottsBad
                      This is pretty standard operating procedure these days. I should say since the 70's. They only vote on narrow interests or along party lines, the rest of the bill is unimportant to them.

                      What worries me is that there may be language that really will expand government oversight of WHO can own a firearm or live in a house with a firearm in it.

                      They have been considering language that gives the Feds the ability to determine who may own a firearm based on medical records.

                      Realize that this would give the Feds the ability to look at your medical records and they may confiscate your gun if you have been treated for even the mildest of mood disorders. In addition, if you have applied for disability insurance based on a mood disorder, say depression, then your rights may be abridged and they can confiscate your firearms WITHOUT due process.

                      As much as I disagree with the notion, there are hundreds of thousands of Americans on Federal Social Security Disability who are claiming disability based of mood disorders. Mood disorders are generally FAR from the psychosis that grips mass murderers. Removing their 2A rights is wrong. So this legislation is intended as a control mechanism over the people, NOT a solution to mass shootings or violence.

                      In Comiefornia, this is already occurring. As I'm sure you are aware police are coming to homes now, demanding to confiscate firearms from people who do not have a record of mental health issues, but have someone in their household who does.

                      We must resist these transparent attempts to simply remove firearms from people without due process! It is a slippery slope that will lead to complete confiscation.

                      This is completely unconstitutional, the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT be infringed.
                      sigpicTake not lightly liberty
                      To have it you must live it
                      And like love, don't you see
                      To keep it you must give it

                      "I will talk with you no more.
                      I will go now, and fight you."
                      (Red Cloud)

                      Comment

                      • #71
                        Tyrone
                        CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 262

                        Panic v. Calm Down

                        We need to remain vigilant and there is much reason for concern given the full court press we are seeing against the RTKBA. Panicking is never good but neither is letting your guard down because you assume it will be taken care of later. With that said, this was a procedural vote to allow debate. "Reports" are that some people voting to allow to debate will not vote for legislation and may join with others in filibustering so that it does not get to final vote. While this is not over by a long shot, we need to remain vigilant and continue to fight so that it is abundantly clear the other side is ultimately fighting a losing battle and it is they who should give up.
                        Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

                        Comment

                        • #72
                          AnthonyD1978
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2010
                          • 647

                          McCain being a senator from Arizona confuses me.
                          Principles over agenda

                          Comment

                          • #73
                            spruce3311
                            Member
                            • Dec 2012
                            • 122

                            Originally posted by Legasat
                            How can Senator Richard Burr from NC be on both lists? Voted for and against the filibuster did he?
                            It's Russian roulette. Allow the amendments to be voted on. Put Dems in pro-gun regions in a bind. Hope the bill fails/filibuster.

                            High risk, high reward.
                            Something Witty

                            Comment

                            • #74
                              Meplat
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Jul 2008
                              • 6903

                              Originally posted by ScottsBad
                              OK, CSPAN is list the compromise points (Of course the devil is in the details).

                              Closes Gun Show loophole, exempts Friend and Neighbor transactions between private individuals.

                              Allows state concealed-carry permit in lieu of BG check.

                              Prohibits Gov from maintaining a "gun registry"

                              Specifies that medical privacy laws DON'T apply to mental health records in the background check DB.

                              Reduces BG check turnaround time. Blah blah.
                              sigpicTake not lightly liberty
                              To have it you must live it
                              And like love, don't you see
                              To keep it you must give it

                              "I will talk with you no more.
                              I will go now, and fight you."
                              (Red Cloud)

                              Comment

                              • #75
                                Tyrone
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Dec 2008
                                • 262

                                "Bipartisan usually means that a larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." George Carlin
                                Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1