Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

No Requirement for Police to Protect Individuals: Looking for Cite

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    DrjonesUSA
    Veteran Member
    • Dec 2005
    • 4680

    Originally posted by Librarian
    Government Code 845 The concept is "sovereign immunity". See link.

    (Thanks to tombinghamthegreat - I had both PC and GC open at the same time, and originally wrote 845 was part of Penal Code.)

    So it appears I was mistaken in my prior post.

    Can you please help us understand? Is this a Federal code, state, or what?

    What govt entities does this code apply to?

    Comment

    • #17
      Librarian
      Admin and Poltergeist
      CGN Contributor - Lifetime
      • Oct 2005
      • 44627

      Originally posted by DrjonesUSA
      So it appears I was mistaken in my prior post.

      Can you please help us understand? Is this a Federal code, state, or what?

      What govt entities does this code apply to?
      California - see http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html

      811.2. "Public entity" includes the State, the Regents of the
      University of California, a county, city, district, public authority,
      public agency, and any other political subdivision or public
      corporation in the State.


      811.4. "Public employee" means an employee of a public entity.
      ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

      Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

      Comment

      • #18
        ldivinag
        In Memoriam
        • Oct 2005
        • 4858

        Originally posted by hawk1
        The last riots in Los Angeles. LAPD cited that as to why they couldn't help those that were being shot at, looted, and burned down...
        exactly...

        no need for references.

        i recently watched a NAT GEO show on the la riots where they interviewed the head dude of LAPD at the normandie intersection and his decision to pull everyone out.

        his reasons were that his officers were not prepared with tools to handle the situation...

        of course they also interviewed chief gates on his view on the outcome...

        they both disagreed with each other.
        leo d.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1