Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

legality of complete lower with no mag release catch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • secretasianman
    Member
    • Dec 2006
    • 155

    legality of complete lower with no mag release catch

    Hi everyone,

    I'm planning on bringing a completed lower (OLL) into CA and my question is:

    Is it a CA-legal configuration with the magazine release catch removed since the magazine essentially won't stay in the lower?
  • #2
    aklover_91
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2006
    • 809

    A lower, separated from an upper, isn't a semiautomatic center fire rifles so is legal no matter what (though there is still some risk involved, here.)

    On an assembled weapon (complete lower mated with a centerfire upper) it would be an AW. The law list 'detachable magazine' as a feature, it's inability to stay in the gun without you holding there does just about everything but make it a 'not detachable' mag.

    If you look at the top of the page you'll see a pull down for an AW flowchart, it's good to consult with questions like this.

    Comment

    • #3
      secretasianman
      Member
      • Dec 2006
      • 155

      Originally posted by aklover_91
      The law list 'detachable magazine' as a feature, it's inability to stay in the gun without you holding there does just about everything but make it a 'not detachable' mag.
      Thanks. I suppose it is a "detachable magazine" if you cup it to keep it from falling out.

      Comment

      • #4
        stix213
        AKA: Joe Censored
        CGN Contributor - Lifetime
        • Apr 2009
        • 18998

        I wouldn't bring the lower here like that if you also bring the mag release parts and an upper, even if not assembled. That is because of a recent AW conviction based on constructive possession, even though no constructive possession is in the actual law.

        Comment

        • #5
          Librarian
          Admin and Poltergeist
          CGN Contributor - Lifetime
          • Oct 2005
          • 44627

          Originally posted by secretasianman
          Hi everyone,

          I'm planning on bringing a completed lower (OLL) into CA and my question is:

          Is it a CA-legal configuration with the magazine release catch removed since the magazine essentially won't stay in the lower?
          I think it a reasonable guess that such would be thought a 'broken' 'assault weapon' - being broken does not cure it's 'essential character'.
          ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

          Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

          Comment

          • #6
            nothinghere2c
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2012
            • 2259

            just buy an $8 bullet button off amazon.com and screw it in. 5 minutes tops and can't be confused with an illegal configuration.

            Comment

            • #7
              garand1945
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2006
              • 851

              Originally posted by nothinghere2c
              just buy an $8 bullet button off amazon.com and screw it in. 5 minutes tops and can't be confused with an illegal configuration.

              ^ this....

              Calguns Legal Foundations needs it money for battles other than easily avoided situations.

              Comment

              • #8
                totenkopf
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2007
                • 520

                Originally posted by stix213
                I wouldn't bring the lower here like that if you also bring the mag release parts and an upper, even if not assembled. That is because of a recent AW conviction based on constructive possession, even though no constructive possession is in the actual law.
                where and when did this happen?

                Comment

                • #9
                  VAReact
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 1519



                  People vs. Nguyen
                  NRA Life Member
                  SAF Life Member (Defenders' Club)
                  CCRKBA Life Member
                  Madison Society Life Member
                  CRPA Life Member

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    secretasianman
                    Member
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 155

                    Originally posted by nothinghere2c
                    just buy an $8 bullet button off amazon.com and screw it in. 5 minutes tops and can't be confused with an illegal configuration.
                    Yeah. I've got one on the way already. My schedule freed up this weekend and it would have been nice to get my business done weekend.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      CBruce
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2012
                      • 1993

                      Originally posted by secretasianman
                      Hi everyone,

                      I'm planning on bringing a completed lower (OLL) into CA and my question is:

                      Is it a CA-legal configuration with the magazine release catch removed since the magazine essentially won't stay in the lower?
                      It's certainly detachable...arguably, it's not attachable, but detachable yes.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        mshill
                        Veteran Member
                        • Dec 2012
                        • 4420

                        Originally posted by VAReact
                        Nguyen was a prohibited person. Implied intent?
                        But I agree, put a BB on it just to be safe.
                        The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Zymergist
                          Member
                          • Apr 2012
                          • 262

                          Guys, as to the $8 BBs, they have come up in the deals page a few times and been removed as they are a direct copy of the actual BB designed and built in CA with large amounts of effort and support to the 2A community. Look for the Prince50 mag lock as the original that supports CA rights.
                          zymurgy:
                          a branch of applied chemistry that studies fermentation processes, as in brewing.



                          www.shop42A.com

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Tmckinney
                            Member
                            • Mar 2012
                            • 311

                            The holding of Nguyen is that possession of the parts to assemble an AW, absent any evidence of intent to build a complying weapon, and coupled with evidnce of an act of assembling a weapon was sufficient for jury to find that he attempted to posses an AW. Although he could have used the parts to build a complying weapon, there was no evidence that he was going to do so, such as a bullet button present but unattached, or uninstalled grip modification. Defendant did not testify. Based on that I would not posses parts for build unless all the featureless parts were there such as a bullet button, etc.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              12voltguy
                              Veteran Member
                              • Feb 2006
                              • 4003

                              Originally posted by nothinghere2c
                              just buy an $8 bullet button off amazon.com and screw it in. 5 minutes tops and can't be confused with an illegal configuration.
                              yup
                              x2

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1