With all the wicked proposals against gun owners in CA being proposed right now, if they happened to pass, many of the infractions are felonious. This means your gun rights are banned forever.
I am curious: Has a court ever looked at a law and said "the punishment for this weapons charge is not befitting the crime, therefore, the level of infraction must be changed"? In other words, has a court thought the crime's punishment was too stiff, yet let the law stand with a lesser punishment? (misdemeanor, fine, etc)
Wondering if this could be the outcome of a CA case against any of these proposed gun laws.
I am curious: Has a court ever looked at a law and said "the punishment for this weapons charge is not befitting the crime, therefore, the level of infraction must be changed"? In other words, has a court thought the crime's punishment was too stiff, yet let the law stand with a lesser punishment? (misdemeanor, fine, etc)
Wondering if this could be the outcome of a CA case against any of these proposed gun laws.
Comment