Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Regulations on .22s

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    Mssr. Eleganté
    Blue Blaze Irregular
    CGN Contributor - Lifetime
    • Oct 2005
    • 10401

    If .44 Henry Rimfire is a .44 caliber rimfire cartridge then you are in luck. If .44 Henry Rimfire is .50 BMG then you are out of luck.
    __________________

    "Knowledge is power... For REAL!" - Jack Austin

    Comment

    • #17
      Quiet
      retired Goon
      • Mar 2007
      • 30241

      Originally posted by phrogg111
      Are those pistols?

      If so, then they're banned because of the threaded barrel.

      If you think .22 rifles with threaded barrels are banned, you're wrong.
      I posted info about the S&W M&P-22 pistol.

      S&W also has rimfire rifles called the M&P-15/22.

      Since the OP asked about "a M@P SW .22", I assumed he was referring to the S&W M&P-22 pistol.
      sigpic

      "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

      Comment

      • #18
        Harrison_Bergeron
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 1974

        Originally posted by TKM
        If your buddy were to bring back a few Tacsol uppers for Ruger MK pistols (unthreaded) he could be very, very popular.
        That sucks, I'd never thought of how the roster affected the Ruger stuff.
        "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle

        Comment

        • #19
          TKM
          Onward through the fog!
          CGN Contributor
          • Jul 2002
          • 10657

          It only affects the Ruger pistols because the receiver is serialized. Can't drop test just an upper.

          Clark and Volquartsen will cheerfully($$$$) change out the barrel in your Ruger upper, but I don't see any way to do that with the Tacsol products.


          Tacsol uppers for Buckmarks are good to go, but I have about a dozen Rugers and no Brownings. Phooey... May have to do it some day.
          Last edited by TKM; 10-25-2012, 11:41 PM.
          It's not PTSD, it's nostalgia.

          Comment

          • #20
            357MagGirl
            Junior Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 25

            Given the nil likelihood of ever really needing to suppress a .22, I wonder if it might be possible to just take it to a gunsmith and have the threading removed.
            Last edited by 357MagGirl; 10-26-2012, 1:44 AM.

            Comment

            • #21
              TKM
              Onward through the fog!
              CGN Contributor
              • Jul 2002
              • 10657

              Blind pinning or turn the threads off/cut down the barrel.

              Sucky options to be rewarded on election day.
              It's not PTSD, it's nostalgia.

              Comment

              • #22
                Staticsouls
                Senior Member
                • Jun 2012
                • 974

                Effective January 1, 2000, Senate Bill 23, Statutes of 1999, established new criteria for defining assault weapons based on generic characteristics. This bill allowed and required persons who owned/possessed firearms that fall under the new "assault weapon" definition to register those firearms with the Department of Justice during the one-year period between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2000. Effective January 1, 2000, this bill added Penal Code Section 12276.1 to the Penal Code as follows.

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1