Upper Receiver Constructive Possession

[Wiz-of-Awd]

Which is why the Feds do not have any laws against AWs at all.

In fact, federally, there is no legal definition of "assault weapon" right now.

But here in CA they seem to.

I'm just not buying into this idea of states being able to come up with their own little set of rules and playbook. That is not part of a union to me. That's "acting" that you are a sole entity.

A.W.D.

[Jason P]

But here in CA they seem to.

I'm just not buying into this idea of states being able to come up with their own little set of rules and playbook. That is not part of a union to me. That's "acting" that you are a sole entity.

A.W.D.

Depends on the state. If you live in Alaska, then state preemption is fine, in California it's horrendous. It's going to be a nightmare if SB1315 gets signed by Brown...

[Aldemar]

Armalite is one of the manufacturers that said they'd be "renaming" their AR platform rifles (specifically to sell to CA) at this year's SHOT show.

http://www.armalite.com/Categories.a...b-822e58014822

I'm in for one!

[Wiz-of-Awd]

Depends on the state. If you live in Alaska, then state preemption is fine, in California it's horrendous. It's going to be a nightmare if SB1315 gets signed by Brown...

I do have lots of family in Anchorage (and Tucson/Phoenix)

A.W.D.

[Mesa Tactical]

I'm just not buying into this idea of states being able to come up with their own little set of rules and playbook. That is not part of a union to me. That's "acting" that you are a sole entity.

That's States' Rights, a concept central to the very idea of the American Republic. It's also part of the Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

[ramathorn]

Let's hear what "your friend" is planning.

[Cannon-Arms]

Again, this question has nothing to do with any NFA or other federal issues.

Hmmm, curious.

I know I've wondered if there was constructive possession issues in Cali. for a blah-de-blah-de-blahhh upper when I have AR lowers about the house.

Maybe I'll thread jack and ask that question in your thread for myself.

No, no I won't!

[LOW2000]

Hmmm, curious.

I know I've wondered if there was constructive possession issues in Cali. when I have AR lowers about the house.

Maybe I'll thread jack and ask that question in your thread for myself.

Maybe i'm already asking about that but don't want some Yee to go trying to ban more things that don't need bannin'.

[Jason P]

I do have lots of family in Anchorage (and Tucson/Phoenix)

A.W.D.

You should rent a room there at least 91 days a year...

[lilro]

Thanks, so if a mfgr simply just changes the model number by a letter or digit of a banned rifle but makes no physical changes whatsoever it would then be legal to sell? Sounds too easy.

Colt did it. It's legit.