Tweet
True anti gun agendas are hidden.
Early gun laws were racist is nature, designed to disarm blacks so that their other rights could be stripped.
Gun control laws allow politicians to divert attention away from other problems caused by laws/policies they created to cater to their cronies at the expense of everyone else.
Take John Holmes, here is a guy who I have a gut feeling had bad effects to psych drugs which caused him to have a disconnect from reality.
Considering that most of the mass murderers over the last 20 years or so were on these types of meds, how come the media isn't all over this issue?
Could it be that Big Pharma is the largest advertiser in the MSM and that the MSM is not going to kill their golden goose.
In fact, if one was a "tin foil hatter", one could come up with the idea that the media loves these events because it creates sensational headlines that boost ratings.
Mass murders create stories with a lot of dirty laundry that can be played from all angles of the three "Cs"(Controversy, Conflict and Compassion) in media which means boosted ratings.
Old saying, if it bleeds, it leads.
The promotion of gun control is emotionally driven and our opponents are snakes, how can we deal in good faith with people who have no honor or integrity.
Fortunately for us fewer Americans are buying the anti gun bs, public opinion is on our side nationwide, support for gun control is at an all time low.
The real dark ages for gun rights actually was in the late 70's, early 80s when the anti gun forces were close to a federal ban on handguns.
If they had succeeded, we probably would have lost our semi auto rifles/shotguns in the 1980s and by now we would be left with only sporting bolt action rifles and 2 shot shotguns if we were lucky.
In California things started going the wrong direction in 1967 and the pace picked up from 1989 till today. We are the battleground state, my hope is that we will become a Brady Campaign F rated state within a few years.
Nicki
Early gun laws were racist is nature, designed to disarm blacks so that their other rights could be stripped.
Gun control laws allow politicians to divert attention away from other problems caused by laws/policies they created to cater to their cronies at the expense of everyone else.
Take John Holmes, here is a guy who I have a gut feeling had bad effects to psych drugs which caused him to have a disconnect from reality.
Considering that most of the mass murderers over the last 20 years or so were on these types of meds, how come the media isn't all over this issue?
Could it be that Big Pharma is the largest advertiser in the MSM and that the MSM is not going to kill their golden goose.
In fact, if one was a "tin foil hatter", one could come up with the idea that the media loves these events because it creates sensational headlines that boost ratings.
Mass murders create stories with a lot of dirty laundry that can be played from all angles of the three "Cs"(Controversy, Conflict and Compassion) in media which means boosted ratings.
Old saying, if it bleeds, it leads.
The promotion of gun control is emotionally driven and our opponents are snakes, how can we deal in good faith with people who have no honor or integrity.
Fortunately for us fewer Americans are buying the anti gun bs, public opinion is on our side nationwide, support for gun control is at an all time low.
The real dark ages for gun rights actually was in the late 70's, early 80s when the anti gun forces were close to a federal ban on handguns.
If they had succeeded, we probably would have lost our semi auto rifles/shotguns in the 1980s and by now we would be left with only sporting bolt action rifles and 2 shot shotguns if we were lucky.
In California things started going the wrong direction in 1967 and the pace picked up from 1989 till today. We are the battleground state, my hope is that we will become a Brady Campaign F rated state within a few years.
Nicki
Comment