After much digging, the only law I could find regarding shooting over a river (or other body of water) had to do with being on National Forest land. The river in question, is fairly small as rivers go (~30ft wide avg) and runs through a valley, which is fairly steep, on both sides. One side of the valley, is privately owned and the other side is BLM land. The property line is the river, itself... or the historic high water mark thereof, or some such.
The owner of the (private) property asked me if I knew whether or not it was okay to shoot a target, on the other side of the valley. So, he'd be shooting a level/horizontal shot, at a target on the other side, at roughly the same elevation. (Not downward or upward). The other side is completely uninhabited and has no roads. In fact, it's so steep, it's basically inaccessible. Both the proposed shooting & target positions, are roughly 120ft above the river. On the target side it's over 2000ft to the top of the ridge, which is 2500 yards distant. Which pretty much makes it a "BFB" or "Big Friggin' Backstop". The terrain is sand/soil, with scattered bushes and trees.
Any ideas?
The owner of the (private) property asked me if I knew whether or not it was okay to shoot a target, on the other side of the valley. So, he'd be shooting a level/horizontal shot, at a target on the other side, at roughly the same elevation. (Not downward or upward). The other side is completely uninhabited and has no roads. In fact, it's so steep, it's basically inaccessible. Both the proposed shooting & target positions, are roughly 120ft above the river. On the target side it's over 2000ft to the top of the ridge, which is 2500 yards distant. Which pretty much makes it a "BFB" or "Big Friggin' Backstop". The terrain is sand/soil, with scattered bushes and trees.
Any ideas?
Comment