Tweet
The military and police are starting to use suppressors in close quarter combat, this is because they reduce noise and muzzle flash in close quarter combat.
The reason silencers were included in the original NFA had to do with poaching.
The public perception of silencers since at least the 1960s is that silencers are tools of highs and that silencers make guns whisper quite(Hollywood).
Hollywood and the anti gun Libtards have set themselves up due to their lies for us to create a new unregulated tool which we would call sound suppressors.
The premise is simple, sound suppressors don't make guns silent, what they do is reduce the decibel volume so that you can shoot your gun without wearing hearing protection, especially in close quarters, like your home.
Just as the first amendment protects political speech even on the internet, it is reasonable that the 2nd amendment also protects modern self defense tools and accessories that make them more effective for their uses.
This would open the door that firearm designs such as threaded barrels are constitutionally protected.
Concealablity is not a factor in most home defense arms since a suppressor would add a few inches to the overall length off a firearm.
The trick would be to come up with a decibel standard that is high enough to be loud, but low enough that pretty much that most if not all silencers could be over the number.
Perhaps automotive exhaust noise levels could be the standard. Ever 5 dbs doubles the volume.
For example, if the standard was that everything above 99db would be a sound suppressor and everything below that would be a regulated silencer.
Criminal penalties could be maintained for suppressors used in crime.
The net effect would be that threaded barrels and sound suppressors would be considered constitutionally protected accessories because they enhance the right of self defense, especially in the home.
A person shouldn't have to risk permanent hearing damage while defending their lives in their homes, after all, isn't that an undue burden on the right of self defense.
Nicki
The reason silencers were included in the original NFA had to do with poaching.
The public perception of silencers since at least the 1960s is that silencers are tools of highs and that silencers make guns whisper quite(Hollywood).
Hollywood and the anti gun Libtards have set themselves up due to their lies for us to create a new unregulated tool which we would call sound suppressors.
The premise is simple, sound suppressors don't make guns silent, what they do is reduce the decibel volume so that you can shoot your gun without wearing hearing protection, especially in close quarters, like your home.
Just as the first amendment protects political speech even on the internet, it is reasonable that the 2nd amendment also protects modern self defense tools and accessories that make them more effective for their uses.
This would open the door that firearm designs such as threaded barrels are constitutionally protected.
Concealablity is not a factor in most home defense arms since a suppressor would add a few inches to the overall length off a firearm.
The trick would be to come up with a decibel standard that is high enough to be loud, but low enough that pretty much that most if not all silencers could be over the number.
Perhaps automotive exhaust noise levels could be the standard. Ever 5 dbs doubles the volume.
For example, if the standard was that everything above 99db would be a sound suppressor and everything below that would be a regulated silencer.
Criminal penalties could be maintained for suppressors used in crime.
The net effect would be that threaded barrels and sound suppressors would be considered constitutionally protected accessories because they enhance the right of self defense, especially in the home.
A person shouldn't have to risk permanent hearing damage while defending their lives in their homes, after all, isn't that an undue burden on the right of self defense.
Nicki
~
Comment