249 Conversion Kit?

[wurger]

Assume someone owns a legal, bullet button equipped AR type rifle. This dopey law passes and the owner removes and discards the bullet button, and installs a dedicated rim fire upper. Would the original .556 upper now be considered a "conversion kit?"

Another scenario. AR rifle is converted to featureless. Owner possesses airsoft guns with a mil spec adjustable stock installed. Could this be considered a "conversion kit" if the airsoft gun was stored in proximity to the real rifle?

Amazing that CA gun laws can get even more confusing and arbitrary.

Mods please delete if you think this might give the idiots more ideas.

[dantodd]

Assume someone owns a legal, bullet button equipped AR type rifle. This dopey law passes and the owner removes and discards the bullet button, and installs a dedicated rim fire upper. Would the original .556 upper now be considered a "conversion kit?"

Another scenario. AR rifle is converted to featureless. Owner possesses airsoft guns with a mil spec adjustable stock installed. Could this be considered a "conversion kit" if the airsoft gun was stored in proximity to the real rifle?

Amazing that CA gun laws can get even more confusing and arbitrary.

Mods please delete if you think this might give the idiots more ideas.

Yes to all the above. Might want to keep this in the general SB249 thread.