Anti-gun Supreme Court

[sholling]

All right: you all saying the SCOTUS can over turn a constitutional amendment seem conveniently to forget the actual history of overturning these things.

Prohibition.

We must note the hedging in the replies that do not understand this.

So, if you want to set your hair afire and run around being totally afraid of a piece of fiction, that's your right. However, if you expect actual people to believe you, you fall into a most unfortunate category--fox newsers. Bye.

CDFingers

ROTFLMAO! You keep ignoring actual historic examples of the court interpreting sections of the constitution out of existence because the facts don't fit your politics.

[dfletcher]

All right: you all saying the SCOTUS can over turn a constitutional amendment seem conveniently to forget the actual history of overturning these things.

Prohibition.

We must note the hedging in the replies that do not understand this.

So, if you want to set your hair afire and run around being totally afraid of a piece of fiction, that's your right. However, if you expect actual people to believe you, you fall into a most unfortunate category--fox newsers. Bye.

CDFingers

To ensure we're using the same lingo, I don't think anyone is proposing SCOTUS would "overturn" (whatever that means) the 2nd Amendment but as we've seen the court has specifically reversed its own decisions several times and on cases of great importance. That is the concern, since it has happened the position has merit. We may all be dead and buried by that time, but it can occur.

Your "it can't happen" position could have merit had SCOTUS never overturned one of it's previous rulings, but since that ship has sailed I think your dismissal of the concern is lacking.

If you'd care to address that the court has reversed it's decisions on occasion, great. If more sweeping platitudes are on the horizon perhaps you'll allow the "bye" in this thread to stand?

[Meplat]

Wrong. People are social creatures. We are a species who likes hierarchies and order.

What you mean WE white boy?

[MultiCaliber]

NEIN!



" The right to own, maintain, transfer, possess, move,operate,sell, purchase, repair, or receive arms in addition to the right to carry, concealed behind a covering garment or shirt or openly exposed for viewing to the general public, in a case,inside of, or outside of a holster, at all times and at all places including government buildings and offices operated by state , city, and Federal facilities,including historical monuments and operational offices, as well as all universities and scholastic buildings at all grade levels currently and any scholarly institution to be initiated in the future, in addition to the right to carry on military installations concealed or openly, will not under any and all possible and conceivable circumstances be taxed, revoked, regulated, superseded, cancelled, deferred, nor will additional requirements be added to require the exercise of this fundamental personal right afforded to all living U.S. citizens enumerated here."

[/I].

I freakin' love that!