Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gay Pride, Gun Pride
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. - H.L Mencken
Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid. - Han Solo
"Moms Demand Action" sounds less like a gun control group and more like the title of a porn flick from the mid-90s. -
A few years ago a lesbian couple very close to us was getting married. They asked me to do the ceremony, and I had to decline. They asked me if I would be there and I said, "Of course, you are my friends".
There is hope in our community. Most of us know gay people and many have gay family members. The church I attend made a deliberate decision not to get involved in anti-gay rights politics. We lost a few members, but it was the right thing to do, both as Americans and Christians. It's not my job to compel anyone to do anything - I leave that to my bossIt is my job to love in both word and deed - and that's a big enough job. As for rights, IMHO we all should stand up for everyone's rights.
As for parallels, the need for wisdom in the political arena is definitely one. I'm willing to bet that Prop 8 would have failed but for one teacher taking her first grade class to a gay wedding without parental permission. Sometimes a dumb move by someone on your side can make for very bad "optics". Personally, I think this was the case with open carry too - and it had the same result.
Of course another parallel is that the real battle is in the courts.Comment
-
vincewarde: I'm in complete agreement. Even with your decision not to marry the lesbian couple. Your moral decision in accordance with your personal faith was perfectly valid and respectable. Neither party's rights were violated
goodlookin1: Have a look at the amendment of the Constitution that directly precedes the second one. The very first part, the Establishment Clause, says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." While I agree that a Judeo-Christian philosophy was and still is engrained in western culture, our Founding Fathers intent seems pretty clear.Comment
-
goodlookin1: Have a look at the amendment of the Constitution that directly precedes the second one. The very first part, the Establishment Clause, says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." While I agree that a Judeo-Christian philosophy was and still is engrained in western culture, our Founding Fathers intent seems pretty clear.Please read the Calguns Wiki
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"Comment
-
That's a very simplistic view. It's too bad history nor reality just don't match it.
It's alright, that's why there are 9 Justices, not one.WTB: French & Finnish firearms. WTS: raw honey, tumbled .45 ACP brass, stupid cat.Comment
-
I can promise you that the Pink Pistols did come up [in a positive context] at SHOT, more than once. Here's a hat tip to Mitch Barrie, owner and president of Mesa Tactical, for being a longtime civil rights advocate.
-BrandonBrandon Combs
I do not read private messages, and my inbox is usually full. If you need to reach me, please email me instead.
My comments are not the official position or a statement of any organization unless stated otherwise. My comments are not legal advice; if you want or need legal advice, hire a lawyer.Comment
-
Originally posted by Connor P PriceComparing a consensual relationship between two loving adults to rape or pedophilia shows a severe lack of logic and suggests that one is so incredibly biased that they are willing to spin whatever lies they want to get to the twisted conclusion they set out for.
As for tradition, that's bs in the extreme. This nation has had traditions of denying people rights and freedom based on skin color also. Tradition is not something to strive for when the tradition is based in hatred and bigotry. This country was founded by and large by people who may have believed in judeo-christian values themselves but the nation itself was not founded on their religious beliefs. It was founded on beliefs that all men were created equal, and that all are deserving of freedom and liberty.
Whether anyone here likes it or not freedom comes with a social cost. The cost of having to tolerate things you may not like. Marriage rights are similar to gun rights in that way. Soon enough, those who are intolerant of homosexuality are going to have to tolerate it anyway. Those who disagree with our right to bear arms are going to have to tolerate it anyway. Just like those who hate blacks have to tolerate them being free, and those who disagree with interracial marriage have to tolerate them as well.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Second, I resent and reject the notion that the judeo-Christian principals = bigotry and hatred. That is something the world wants you to believe.
Lastly, your right about freedom....there is good and bad, things which benefit us and things that we dont agree with. And you're probably right that I will someday have to come to terms with what is coming in regards to the redefining the meaning of marriage. But in regards to tradition, it's not just our nation that's held the traditional definition....it's been this way for a loooong time throughout the world. And I don't think we should look to tradition in every case....not at all because we have to learn from our mistakes, and we certainly weren't perfect in the past. But I don't believe this case is one of those that we should see as a mistake (marriage being between a man and woman only). On that we will probably have to agree to disagree.Comment
-
-
It's alright, that's why there are 9 Justices, not one.Comment
-
Please read the Calguns Wiki
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
--Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"Comment
-
-
Gay marriage is not a right 2A is.
I don't care if someone is gay or wants to get married I'm a true conservative I don't think the government should tell any lawful American citizen what they can and can't do as long as its not hurting other people.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,857,073
Posts: 25,027,607
Members: 354,385
Active Members: 6,347
Welcome to our newest member, JU83.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 2754 users online. 147 members and 2607 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment