Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

HOW TO WIN ELECTIONS - FOR OUR CIVIL RIGHTS - IN 2012!! (Part One)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oaklander
    Banned
    • May 2006
    • 11095

    HOW TO WIN ELECTIONS - FOR OUR CIVIL RIGHTS - IN 2012!! (Part One)

    I am going to explain how to use social media, and direct social action, to win elections, for our civil rights, in 2012.

    First, a little about me:
    • I started using the internet in 1992, and was one of the beta testers for AOL back in the late 1980's.
    • I have also used CompuServe, Prodigy, USENET, The Well, etc. . .
    • I am a technology geek from way back. My first computer was a VIC-20. And the first computer I actually used was a DEC PDP-8.
    • In 1994, I founded the very first company to market professional services firms on the internet.
    • In 1996, I created one of the first political campaign sites (it was for a ballot proposition).
    • That same year, I sat on a discussion panel with Ross Perot's internet campaign manager.
    • I did the web marketing for the largest law firm in the state.
    • I have written more than 70 published articles on related topics, and have given more than 30 invited presentations.


    So this stuff is NOT something I just picked up from reading a book, or something. . .



    NOW - here is what to do to win an election:

    IDENTIFY CANDIDATES AND WHO THEY ARE CONNECTED TO

    When a candidate enters a race, they will create a Facebook page, most of the time. This also allows you to get a sense of who their supporters are (by looking at who they are linked to, on Facebook).

    Do some googling to see what you can find out about the candidate. This is called opposition research. This will help you understand what their politics are likely to be, and whether they support our rights or not.

    MAKE POLITE CONTACT

    Start interacting with that candidate on their page. Be very nice. At some point, after you have established trust, start asking them about their stance on our civil rights. Point out that our civil rights ARE civil rights, and give them a history lesson about how the KKK started as a gun control group. How Mulford was designed to disarm blacks in Oakland, and stuff like that. Try to get them to state, for the record, that they support ALL civil rights, and especially our basic right of self defense. You do not need to cite court cases, since the right exists before anything else. It is a basic human right.

    The Winkler and Lott books are good sources for background on this stuff.

    Remember that civil rights are not policy issues, and do not get sucked into arguing cost vs. benefits on any of this stuff. We actually DO win on cost vs. benefits analysis, but that is a backup argument. The main argument is that self defense is a civil right, a human right, and underlies ALL other rights!

    MONITOR THE PLAYING FIELD

    At the same time, start watching for any news articles about the candidate and/or their views. You can set up a Google news search to keep you updated via instant messages whenever the candidate speaks or is written about. See this link.

    All main news sites now use Facebook as their commenting system. Organize on the back end (through YOUR Facebook friends) and start doing "missions." What this means is that if the candidate even TOUCHES the gun issue in a negative way, nicely correct them. Point out that any elected official who is anti-gun is anti-civil-rights, and is alignment with folks like the KKK (or whatever talking point will have the most logical impact). Do this via the Facebook comments. Try to avoid arguing with anti-gun people. If you can't educate someone, just shake the dirt off your shoes and go on to the next person. Whatever you do, please remember the adage to never be the craziest person in the room. We win by pointing out that WE are actually the majority on this issue, and we are the REASONABLE and morally CORRECT majority.

    THUS, your tone should never be angry or strident. Remember, we actually ARE the good guys and gals here. We comport ourselves as such. The way we talk here on the forums IS NOT the way we talk in public.

    ALSO - never use lies, deception, or anything like that. The truth here is what we have going for us. Our mission is to literally spread the Gospel of truth that our civil rights are the main rights that protect everything else. That is a powerful message, and there is no way to refute, or even rebut TRUTH.

    Truth is truth. . .

    And truth is what will hurt our political opposition.

    POSTSCRIPT

    It is no secret that I am a Christian. I started getting religious in 1996, and have been searching for a good church since then. The guy who married me and Sierra is a biker, and found God when he nearly killed himself taking a gun out of his safe. He accidently shot himself in the chest, and missed his heart by less than an inch.

    My current church is the one I have been looking for all my life, and it is here in the flat part of Oakland. We are all people who narrowly missed a bullet, at least metaphorically, and in many cases, literally. . .

    THIS is my religion, and it is not soft, or weak.

    Back on topic. . .

    Our civil rights movement is essentially a moral movement. It does not matter what religion you are, or even if you have religion. But if you do not think that human rights IS a moral issue, you are thinking wrong.

    The way to win a moral battle is by BEING MORAL. This means that we act with dignity, and we always remember that we are the good folks, in this political arena. We do not do dirty political tricks, we just educate, and we simply show people who they are voting for, if they decide that they want to vote for an anti-rights candidate.

    We WILL absolutely win any election that we get involved in. We have the numbers now, and we have the correct polling behind the numbers. This is a perfect storm to change California politics, for the next 40 years. I am saying that as someone who knows how things work.

    ETA: please review this link as well - and PLEASE realize that we all work as one winning team. I take this for granted, but some folks may not be aware that we all work as a single team: http://www.nramemberscouncils.com/actvist-tips.shtml
    Last edited by oaklander; 01-20-2012, 4:21 PM.
  • #2
    J.D.Allen
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 2340

    I love listening to you, it motivates me. Let's do this!

    Comment

    • #3
      oaklander
      Banned
      • May 2006
      • 11095

      Originally posted by J.D.Allen
      I love listening to you, it motivates me. Let's do this!
      WINNING!!!!!

      Yes, it is no accident that I am a Pentecostal, we can TALK UP A STORM!!!

      Seriously, I have been kind of watching this whole issue for the last couple of years, and we actually ARE at the tipping point. This means that this election year, we have the mass support of the majority of Americans, on our civil rights issues.

      One side point, this must always be a grassroots thing, and must never be around a person. THAT is why I do not get quoted in media, and why I have never been photographed by media. I am seriously just some fat old guy who lives in East Oakland - BUT TOGETHER, WE ARE ALL A MAJOR FORCE.

      Comment

      • #4
        oaklander
        Banned
        • May 2006
        • 11095

        Interesting!

        Comment

        • #5
          ja308
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Nov 2009
          • 12660

          ^5 thank you for sharing wisdom

          Comment

          • #6
            LBDamned
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Feb 2011
            • 19040

            it would be great if there were a higher percentage of cerebral voters in this country that could/would implement the kind of info research needed to make the right decision (such as listed in OP)...

            To my/our demise, a large percentage of voting sheeple will be swayed by the media and/or vote based solely on personality and unfolding of irrelevant drama (again as propagated by media).

            In a world of reality TV and TMZ - it's an uphill battle... but I like to think its possible to get this country back to what it was initially founded upon. Hopefully there are still enough "true" Americans that understand the importance.
            "Kamala is a radical leftist lunatic" ~ Donald J. Trump

            Comment

            • #7
              oaklander
              Banned
              • May 2006
              • 11095

              Originally posted by ja308
              ^5 thank you for sharing wisdom
              Welcome!




              Sent from my brain, to yours. . .

              Comment

              • #8
                oaklander
                Banned
                • May 2006
                • 11095

                Originally posted by LBDamned
                it would be great if there were a higher percentage of cerebral voters in this country that could/would implement the kind of info research needed to make the right decision (such as listed in OP)...

                To my/our demise, a large percentage of voting sheeple will be swayed by the media and/or vote based solely on personality and unfolding of irrelevant drama (again as propagated by media).

                In a world of reality TV and TMZ - it's an uphill battle... but I like to think its possible to get this country back to what it was initially founded upon. Hopefully there are still enough "true" Americans that understand the importance.
                Yes, and I think in CA, the easiest way to tell if a politician is brave and forward thinking is whether they support our carry rights. I would like that to be our main concern this time.

                Next time, it will be the CA AWB, if that POS is still around (but smart money says it will be gone in 18 months).


                Sent from my brain, to yours. . .

                Comment

                • #9
                  OleCuss
                  Calguns Addict
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 7933

                  I thoroughly enjoyed the OP as well.

                  Just want to remind everyone that getting too ideologically pure doesn't work too well.

                  You go to battle with the weapons you have - not the ones you wish you had. And if you lose, you're just a loser (politically, that is).

                  You have to win.

                  And this year is one in which there is a very real possibility of winning for our civil rights. The terrain of the political battlefield has changed and if those who are freedom-minded are energized and willing to devote themselves, conventional wisdom may discover it was tomfoolery.
                  CGN's token life-long teetotaling vegetarian. Don't consider anything I post as advice or as anything more than opinion (if even that).

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    oaklander
                    Banned
                    • May 2006
                    • 11095

                    Originally posted by OleCuss
                    I thoroughly enjoyed the OP as well.

                    Just want to remind everyone that getting too ideologically pure doesn't work too well.

                    You go to battle with the weapons you have - not the ones you wish you had. And if you lose, you're just a loser (politically, that is).

                    You have to win.

                    And this year is one in which there is a very real possibility of winning for our civil rights. The terrain of the political battlefield has changed and if those who are freedom-minded are energized and willing to devote themselves, conventional wisdom may discover it was tomfoolery.
                    Correct, and even as far back as biblical times, the early church was pragmatic. I kind of like to study how things happen, and everything I have learned points out that ideology loses to common sense. That is why OWS never got off the ground - they were TOO idealistic, and unfocused, and easily co-opted. Here, the key is to be firm, but flexible, and remember that we do this out of a love for our rights, and not out of any kind of hate.

                    That was the other thing they did wrong, they were TOO strident, and it does not play well with the media, popular opinion, or anything. In fact, strident social movements attract mean people - and mean people generally SUCK!!!

                    So, as I keep saying - never be the craziest person in the room, and just really know that we are right, on a moral sense, and just plain common sense (setting aside historically, and legally, etc.).

                    THIS is what helps the court cases stick. We ARE just normal folks, who want to protect our families, hunt, target shoot, compete, collect, build, etc. . .

                    For WAAAAAY TOOOOO MANY YEARS, we were kind of second class citizens, and even considered fringe folks. So not true.


                    Sent from my brain, to yours. . .

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      zhyla
                      Banned
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 2017

                      Originally posted by oaklander
                      We WILL absolutely win any election that we get involved in. We have the numbers now, and we have the correct polling behind the numbers. This is a perfect storm to change California politics, for the next 40 years. I am saying that as someone who knows how things work.
                      I appreciate your motivation and devotion to this cause. But no matter how many times you state that you know what you're talking about... I just think this is completely disconnected from reality.

                      Can you show some survey statistics that shows CA voters have all of a sudden made a 180 and care about gun regulations -- let alone loosening them? Last time I checked voters here are disinterested at best.

                      Looking at the last couple years of legislation my view is we're barely staying afloat in the legislature. All the real action is in court. Sure, judges are elected officials too, and if you can point at which judges are pro-gun I'll gladly vote for them. I haven't had good success determining a judicial candidates 2A-ness.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        DannyInSoCal
                        Calguns Addict
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 8271

                        Another reason why I'm pissed at the NRA -

                        THEY should be doing this 24/7....
                        .
                        $500 Donation to any Veterans Charity - Plus $500 Gift Card to any gun store: Visit 2nd Amendment Mortgage / www.2AMortgage.com

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          BobB35
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 782

                          Here is my suggestion....if you care about gun rights, vote in a state that respects them....Never happen in CA this state is too far gone with progressives and welfare people making up the majority of the electorate, CA will never change until it is backed into a corner and forced to change. How that happens is up to debate...I just don't think it will be through the ballot box.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Uxi
                            Calguns Addict
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 5155

                            I hope you can get someone pro gun elected in Oakland. I really really do. Unfortunately I don't believe it's going to happen.
                            "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -- Thomas Jefferson

                            9mm + 5.56mm =
                            .45ACP + 7.62 NATO =
                            10mm + 6.8 SPC =
                            sigpic

                            Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis; Jn 1:14

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              GOEX FFF
                              ☆ North Texas ☆
                              CGN Contributor
                              • Jun 2007
                              • 6180

                              Oak, this is one of the reasons why I've always given you "The most inspirational Calgunner" award.

                              Thanks for posting it!
                              Stand for the Flag - Kneel for the Cross

                              The 2nd Amendment Explained

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1