Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Eventual benefit from long-gun "registration"?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jaymz
    CGSSA Associate
    • Oct 2006
    • 6297

    Eventual benefit from long-gun "registration"?

    Seeing how serial numbers for long-gun purchases are now recorded on the DROS forms, would it be feasable to believe that rifles being melted into rebar by the truckload will eventually be a rarity? Law enforcement will no longer have the excuse that there isn't a way to track down the legal owners and return the firearms to them. I know the practice won't go away completely for various reasons, but it should be drastically reduced. Right?
    War is when your Government tells you who the enemy is......

    Revolution is when you figure it out for yourself.
  • #2
    NytWolf
    Veteran Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 3935

    The SN's are on the 4473?

    Comment

    • #3
      SantaCabinetguy
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Feb 2011
      • 15137

      Originally posted by jaymz
      Seeing how serial numbers for long-gun purchases are now recorded on the DROS forms, would it be feasable to believe that rifles being melted into rebar by the truckload will eventually be a rarity? Law enforcement will no longer have the excuse that there isn't a way to track down the legal owners and return the firearms to them. I know the practice won't go away completely for various reasons, but it should be drastically reduced. Right?
      Hauoli Makahiki Hou


      -------

      Comment

      • #4
        Dreaded Claymore
        Veteran Member
        • May 2010
        • 3231

        Do they attempt to return handguns to their owners?

        Comment

        • #5
          scarville
          CGN/CGSSA Contributor
          • Feb 2009
          • 2325

          Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
          Do they attempt to return handguns to their owners?
          Once upon on a time the police did try to return them.
          Politicians and criminals are moral twins separated only by legal fiction.

          Comment

          • #6
            Fate
            Calguns Addict
            • Apr 2006
            • 9545

            Originally posted by scarville
            Once upon on a time the police did try to return them.
            Sounds like a fairytale.
            sigpic "On bended knee is no way to be free." - Eddie Vedder, "Guaranteed"

            "Let your gun therefore be the constant companion of your walks." -Thomas Jefferson
            , in a letter to his nephew Peter Carr dated August 19, 1785

            Comment

            • #7
              ja308
              I need a LIFE!!
              • Nov 2009
              • 12660

              Originally posted by jaymz
              Seeing how serial numbers for long-gun purchases are now recorded on the DROS forms, would it be feasable to believe that rifles being melted into rebar by the truckload will eventually be a rarity? Law enforcement will no longer have the excuse that there isn't a way to track down the legal owners and return the firearms to them. I know the practice won't go away completely for various reasons, but it should be drastically reduced. Right?
              Historically registration has been used as a prelude to consfication .

              Not saying it will happen in cali . Just that every serious consfiction effort has been preceded by registration -- www.JPFO.org has done some really great research on this topic and more .

              Comment

              • #8
                CDFingers
                Banned
                • Mar 2008
                • 1852

                I think Brown signed it to bring it in line with hand guns. I disagree with his signing it. No serial number need be stored.

                If we want to argue against registration, we need to make the case that knowing where the guns are is a bad thing if citizens are going to preserve the security of a free state.

                But that will hinge upon the definition of a "free" state: does it mean the citizens are free (no registration), or does it mean the state will be defended by citizens who've recorded their serial numbers? If the .gov wanted to prevent the citizens from taking the .gov by force, then recording serial numbers makes sense (the "confiscation" argument).

                The question arises about whether the .gov would seek to violate the 4th Amendment in order to come git them gunz. It seems a stretch, but it bears paying attention.

                I do agree that serial numbers will help with gun ID. But I think it best for the gun owner to take a pic of the gun, showing the serial number, and to keep it in a safe place. Then, god forbid, if the gun is stolen, the owner shows the pic to the cops, who then can use it to identify the gun, if they find it. I don't think it necessary for them already to have that number.

                So, I find zero value in "registration."

                CDFingers

                Comment

                • #9
                  Pyrodyne
                  C3 Contributor
                  CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                  • Apr 2009
                  • 264

                  Originally posted by CDFingers
                  The question arises about whether the .gov would seek to violate the 4th Amendment in order to come git them gunz. It seems a stretch, but it bears paying attention.
                  Do we forget Katrina so soon?



                  Not a stretch at all, not one bit and by no means a long shot.
                  Originally posted by jdberger
                  5 that bother to show up are worth a thousand who have "really strong feelings" but already committed to going fishing that day....

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    CDFingers
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2008
                    • 1852

                    The way I understand it, they went "door to door" in New Orleans. So, having an address to search without a warrant is different from going door to door. But you're correct: the 4th was violated in New Orleans in a sort of blanket way.

                    After that, LA passed laws, as did many other states, prohibiting the confiscation of weapons during natural disasters.

                    "In 2007 LaMalfa successfully passed AB 1645, a law that would prevent seizures of firearms in the event of an emergency or natural disaster. This was the first pro-gun legislation passed and signed into law in a decade. LaMalfa was named the California Rifle and Pistol Associations "Legislator of the Year".

                    link to wiki page:



                    Criminals don't obey laws, which is one reason we're armed.

                    CDFingers

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      ColdDeadHands1
                      Veteran Member
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 3391

                      What percentage of total handguns / long guns owned get stolen and recovered by the police in the 1st place? An infinitesimally small number. I'd rather take my chances and keep my long gun purchases unregistered than submit to our bureaucratic masters and register "for my own good".


                      "Let me guess... This isn't about the alcohol or tobacco?"

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        jamesob
                        Veteran Member
                        • Jan 2008
                        • 4821

                        They will make no attempt to put the rifles back into the hands of a civilian.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Cali-Shooter
                          Calguns Addict
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 9192

                          The potential for wrong far outweighs the potential for right RE: mandatory long gun registration. That's where most of the problem is.
                          In Glock We Trust.
                          Originally posted by jeep7081
                          My wife sleeps better knowing we have a zombie killer... Saiga AK47! Although my neighbor with his AR has restless nights.
                          Originally posted by AleksandreCz
                          Thank god the Federal Government is there to protect us from the Federal Government
                          WTS: Revision 'Desert Locust' tactical Ballistic/Protective eyewear goggles NEW & USED pairs
                          http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/s...d.php?t=737563

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            chris
                            I need a LIFE!!
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 19447

                            Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
                            Do they attempt to return handguns to their owners?
                            Originally posted by scarville
                            Once upon on a time the police did try to return them.
                            Originally posted by Fate
                            Sounds like a fairytale.
                            in a galaxy far far away.
                            http://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                            sigpic
                            Thank your neighbor and fellow gun owners for passing Prop 63. For that gun control is a winning legislative agenda.
                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6Dj8tdSC1A
                            contact the governor
                            https://govnews.ca.gov/gov39mail/mail.php
                            In Memory of Spc Torres May 5th 2006 al-Hillah, Iraq. I will miss you my friend.
                            NRA Life Member.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            UA-8071174-1