Fascinating little problem hidden in the US v Arizona case regarding Arizona's SB1070.  I believe it has the potential to have significant relevance to the RKBA but I'm not sure how it all sorts out.
Here's the link to the 9th Circuit ruling: http://tinyurl.com/d8yynnj
The problem that I see is that they appear to be allowing federal pre-emption when state law causes consternation on the part of foreign governments and our government doesn't like it. This appears to be based on Garamendi.
So Obama gets complaints from Mexico about firearms being sold in the U.S. ending up South of the border due to states allowing ready access to firearms. Obama and company may decide that this means they have pre-emptive authority to void the irritating state law.
Presidential fiat is enabled by foreign governments to violate our rights. Sweet!!! (Not.)
I'm hoping I'm totally mis-reading the implications.
					Here's the link to the 9th Circuit ruling: http://tinyurl.com/d8yynnj
The problem that I see is that they appear to be allowing federal pre-emption when state law causes consternation on the part of foreign governments and our government doesn't like it. This appears to be based on Garamendi.
So Obama gets complaints from Mexico about firearms being sold in the U.S. ending up South of the border due to states allowing ready access to firearms. Obama and company may decide that this means they have pre-emptive authority to void the irritating state law.
Presidential fiat is enabled by foreign governments to violate our rights. Sweet!!! (Not.)
I'm hoping I'm totally mis-reading the implications.

 
	 
	 
	
 
							
						 
	
 
							
						 
							
						 
	

 
	 
	 
							
						 
	
 
							
						 
	 
	 
	 
	
Comment