Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
|
|
|
|
|
|
militarization of cifvilian police
Collapse
X
-
Just taking up space in (what is no longer) the second-worst small town in California.Comment
-
In another era, in another land, Bratton would have fit perfectly - absolutely perfectly - into a Gestapo or Cheka/NKVD uniform.
Exercising one's God-given, Second Amendment-secured rights = "gun crazy."Comment
-
please do not fall for this pathetic attempt to drive a wedge between LEO's and gun owners.
california anti-gun lobby's new strategy: trying to turn non-LEO gun owners against LEO's by making them covetous of the privileges of working as a LEO. we shouldnt be taking LEO's rights away, we should be giving rights back to the rest of the state.
however the "gun-crazy" comment was offensive.Comment
-
please do not fall for this pathetic attempt to drive a wedge between LEO's and gun owners.
california anti-gun lobby's new strategy: trying to turn non-LEO gun owners against LEO's by making them covetous of the privileges of working as a LEO. we shouldnt be taking LEO's rights away, we should be giving rights back to the rest of the state.
however the "gun-crazy" comment was offensive.
I don't want that the police have, I want the police to have what I have. I don't need an APC,or a spy drone...they don't need them either.sigpic
Comment
-
Purposefully offensive: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B4k...JlYWU1YTYyNWY2"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws. That's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
Originally posted by indiandaveIn Pennsylvania Your permit to carry concealed is called a License to carry fire arms. Other states call it a CCW. In New Jersey it's called a crime.Comment
-
please do not fall for this pathetic attempt to drive a wedge between LEO's and gun owners.
california anti-gun lobby's new strategy: trying to turn non-LEO gun owners against LEO's by making them covetous of the privileges of working as a LEO. we shouldnt be taking LEO's rights away, we should be giving rights back to the rest of the state.
however the "gun-crazy" comment was offensive.
Pathetic attempt? do you not realize that equipment is to protect THEM - - not US??Comment
-
-
please do not fall for this pathetic attempt to drive a wedge between LEO's and gun owners.
california anti-gun lobby's new strategy: trying to turn non-LEO gun owners against LEO's by making them covetous of the privileges of working as a LEO. we shouldnt be taking LEO's rights away, we should be giving rights back to the rest of the state.
however the "gun-crazy" comment was offensive.
Do they need an armored truck - obviously not, but who cares? Police like fun stuff as much as we do, and if they got an APC for $350K, they got a deal.
As for the rest of it (the helmets and ARs), I have no problem with police departments arming their patrol officers with effective weapons and defenses. I'd love to see every officer wearing body armor, and (during an emergency) a ballistic helmet would be appropriate.
AR-15s have been standard equipment for over a decade (since the North Hollywood shootout I believe); and the author's terror at the use of "multi-pocket vests" somewhat betrays his fear peddling.
As for the use of unmanned drones - again, who cares? Drones do surveillance without putting living persons in harm's way. If you want to follow a suspect without needing to physically follow him, a drone is a great way to do that. These would be a great help in fighting the cartels.I use to be an anarchist but I quit that; there's too many rules.Comment
-
if it's not frivolous spending and it helps them fight real crime more efficiently. The problem (to me) is departmental doctrine, training, and culture - are they using the stuff to go after real crime and criminals, or are they painting the general public as comprised entirely of potential enemies? In the case of LA, the answer is clear (and wrong)...Comment
-
if it's not frivolous spending and it helps them fight real crime more efficiently. The problem (to me) is departmental doctrine, training, and culture - are they using the stuff to go after real crime and criminals, or are they painting the general public as comprised entirely of potential enemies? In the case of LA, the answer is clear (and wrong)...Comment
-
It should bother you that the military is better armed than the civilians."Bruen, the Bruen opinion, I believe, discarded the intermediate scrutiny test that I also thought was not very useful; and has, instead, replaced it with a text history and tradition test." Judge Benitez 12-12-2022
NRA Endowment Life Member, CRPA Life Member
GLOCK (Gen 1-5, G42/43), Colt AR15/M16/M4, Sig P320, Sig P365, Beretta 90 series, Remington 870, HK UMP Factory Armorer
Remington Nylon, 1911, HK, Ruger, Hudson H9 Armorer, just for fun!
I instruct it if you shoot it.Comment
-
No, because the military isn't roaming the streets of our country.Comment
Calguns.net Statistics
Collapse
Topics: 1,856,821
Posts: 25,024,571
Members: 354,026
Active Members: 5,882
Welcome to our newest member, Hadesloridan.
What's Going On
Collapse
There are currently 4001 users online. 139 members and 3862 guests.
Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.
Comment