If this has been discussed before, I apologize but I don't recall seeing it mentioned and I typically check "new posts" every day.
As of January 1st, our dysfunctional legislature used their collective wisdom to renumber the sections within the dangerous weapons control law - typically Penal Code sections 12000 and up.
Why? Nobody knows. They thought it was necessary. Maybe so they have something to tout to their voters when they try to get re-elected. I can tell you that the California Districit Attorneys' Association has been fighting against this idea for several years. But then, why would the politicians care what CDAA thinks?
So for those of you who were familiar with things like 12025 PC - carrying a concealed weapon and 12031 PC - carrying a loaded weapon and 12020 PC - felony possession of a dirk or dagger, those will all be renumbered to 25400(a)(1), 25850(a) and 21310 respectively. And there are many, many more sections involved.
The bigger question (for me) is whether they "snuck" in any substantive changes to the laws. We're just starting to go through the language itself, now that the new 2012 Penal Codes have arrived, but its slow going. I guess I just don't trust our legislature. Call me cynical.
Anyone know offhand if this is "just" a renumbering? Or are they being sneaky, sneaky with the language, too?
As of January 1st, our dysfunctional legislature used their collective wisdom to renumber the sections within the dangerous weapons control law - typically Penal Code sections 12000 and up.
Why? Nobody knows. They thought it was necessary. Maybe so they have something to tout to their voters when they try to get re-elected. I can tell you that the California Districit Attorneys' Association has been fighting against this idea for several years. But then, why would the politicians care what CDAA thinks?
So for those of you who were familiar with things like 12025 PC - carrying a concealed weapon and 12031 PC - carrying a loaded weapon and 12020 PC - felony possession of a dirk or dagger, those will all be renumbered to 25400(a)(1), 25850(a) and 21310 respectively. And there are many, many more sections involved.
The bigger question (for me) is whether they "snuck" in any substantive changes to the laws. We're just starting to go through the language itself, now that the new 2012 Penal Codes have arrived, but its slow going. I guess I just don't trust our legislature. Call me cynical.
Anyone know offhand if this is "just" a renumbering? Or are they being sneaky, sneaky with the language, too?

Comment