Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

question about federal school zones and reciprocal LTC

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fd15k
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 1049

    question about federal school zones and reciprocal LTC

    Guys,

    CalGuns wiki has a link to a BATF opinion stating that while carrying with a state recognized LTC which is not issued by that same state, one would be in violation of GFSZA should he carry in a school zone.

    I was unable to google up any cases where somebody would be prosecuted for that. But the question is what legal authority does BATF have in this matter to offer an interpretation ?

    Thanks!
  • #2
    paul0660
    In Memoriam
    • Jul 2007
    • 15669

    what legal authority does BATF have in this matter to offer an interpretation ?
    Because interpretations are like bungholes, everyone has one. I have read the same thing.

    The only Federal prosecutions for GFSZ have been in US Territories and as an add on to other crimes in the US. There have been a few threads about just that.
    *REMOVE THIS PART BEFORE POSTING*

    Comment

    • #3
      Kharn
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 1219

      You have to be really special to attract federal law enforcement interest for carrying in a school zone with an out-of-state permit or while OCing.

      Comment

      • #4
        mrdd
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 2023

        by the State in which the school zone is located or a
        political subdivision of the State
        , and the law of the State or
        political subdivision requires that, before an individual obtains
        such a license, the law enforcement authorities of the State or
        political subdivision verify that the individual is qualified
        under law to receive the license;

        Also note that the law prohibits discharge within a school zone, and that an LTC or self defense is not an exception:

        (3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), it shall be
        unlawful for any person, knowingly or with reckless disregard for
        the safety of another, to discharge or attempt to discharge a
        firearm
        that has moved in or that otherwise affects interstate or
        foreign commerce at a place that the person knows is a school zone.
        (B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to the discharge of a firearm
        -
        (i) on private property not part of school grounds;
        (ii) as part of a program approved by a school in the school
        zone, by an individual who is participating in the program;
        (iii) by an individual in accordance with a contract entered
        into between a school in a school zone and the individual or an
        employer of the individual; or
        (iv) by a law enforcement officer acting in his or her official
        capacity.

        Comment

        • #5
          fd15k
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 1049

          Originally posted by mrdd
          The law is clear:
          But reciprocity gives licenses of recognized states same legal weight under state law. Does that not matter in this case ?

          Comment

          • #6
            Gray Peterson
            Calguns Addict
            • Jan 2005
            • 5817

            Originally posted by fd15k
            But reciprocity gives licenses of recognized states same legal weight under state law. Does that not matter in this case ?
            As currently written, the BATFE letter is correct. This is why I acquire as many out of state licenses as I can to the most extent possible.

            I will keep from commenting further...

            Comment

            • #7
              Librarian
              Admin and Poltergeist
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Oct 2005
              • 44628

              Originally posted by fd15k
              But reciprocity gives licenses of recognized states same legal weight under state law. Does that not matter in this case ?
              No, it does not matter.

              Reciprocity does not apply to Federal law until the Feds say it does.

              It doesn't always even apply among states, automatically.
              ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

              Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

              Comment

              • #8
                fd15k
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2008
                • 1049

                Originally posted by Gray Peterson
                As currently written, the BATFE letter is correct. This is why I acquire as many out of state licenses as I can to the most extent possible.

                I will keep from commenting further...
                Sounds good. Perhaps no further commenting is even required, unless somebody has information on related legal developments

                Comment

                • #9
                  mrdd
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 2023

                  Originally posted by fd15k
                  But reciprocity gives licenses of recognized states same legal weight under state law. Does that not matter in this case ?
                  But the federal law is clear that for exemption of possession you must be:

                  Licensed by the state where the SZ is located and that to receive such a license, the LEAs of the state (where the SZ is located) must verify that the person is qualified under the law to receive the license.

                  How could any reciprocal state law qualify for this?

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    mrdd
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 2023

                    It appears that H.R. 822 would make this a moot point. It includes:

                    (b) The possession or carrying of a concealed hand-gun in a State under this section shall be subject to the same conditions and limitations, except as to eligibility to possess or carry, imposed by or under Federal or State law or the law of a political subdivision of a State, that apply to the possession or carrying of a concealed handgun by residents of the State or political subdivision who are licensed by the State or political subdivision to do so, or not prohibited by the State from doing so.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    UA-8071174-1