Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Chicago AW ban

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gunsandrockets
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1537

    Chicago AW ban

    WTH?

    I thought I was up to speed about pro-gun litigation, but I just heard about the case of Wilson vs Cook County which is an ongoing challenge to a nasty AW ban.

    The Illinois Municipal League was founded in 1913 and has worked continuously for the benefit of municipalities. The governing board is comprised of Mayors and Village Presidents.


    I had heard about the NRA challenge to the Washington D.C. AW ban but I hadn't heard about the Cook County case.
    Guns don't kill people, Democrats kill people
  • #2
    Silverlake223
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 795

    "and assault weapons are 20 times more likely to be used in
    the commission of a crime than other kinds of weapons"


    I think this is extremely incorrect! I think nation wide its like .5% or something low like that! Perhaps in Chicago they have a better class of criminal, but here in LA according to my LAPD friends, the only "assault weapons" they usually recover pertaining to the commission of a crime is a cheap SKS every once in awhile.

    I was born and raised in Chicago, and would never go back there. Its a violent City, and the residents (in city limits) are unprotected except for the reactive thin blue line.
    Quod sumus hoc eritis

    Comment

    • #3
      m03
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2007
      • 1908

      Originally posted by Silverlake223
      "and assault weapons are 20 times more likely to be used in
      the commission of a crime than other kinds of weapons"


      I think this is extremely incorrect! I think nation wide its like .5% or something low like that! Perhaps in Chicago they have a better class of criminal, but here in LA according to my LAPD friends, the only "assault weapons" they usually recover pertaining to the commission of a crime is a cheap SKS every once in awhile.

      I was born and raised in Chicago, and would never go back there. Its a violent City, and the residents (in city limits) are unprotected except for the reactive thin blue line.
      At the height of the AW FUD, AWs represented less than 3% of all guns used in crimes according to the FBI. It's been several years since I looked at it myself, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was 0.5% these days.

      Comment

      • #4
        Nick Justice
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 1985

        This was decided prior to McDonald. I hope the good guys get the chance to refute the hopelessly inaccurate statistics quoted in the decision.
        It doesn't matter how scary, ugly, uncomfortable, or inconvenient self defense can be. Like it or not, you will never, ever be relieved of your duty and responsibility to defend your life, your family, your country and your freedom.

        How much ammo do I need? Enough to last me the rest of my life, and then lot more for later.

        The government does not come knocking at your door. It comes knocking down your door.

        Comment

        • #5
          safewaysecurity
          Calguns Addict
          • Jun 2010
          • 6166

          Originally posted by Silverlake223
          "and assault weapons are 20 times more likely to be used in
          the commission of a crime than other kinds of weapons"


          I think this is extremely incorrect! I think nation wide its like .5% or something low like that! Perhaps in Chicago they have a better class of criminal, but here in LA according to my LAPD friends, the only "assault weapons" they usually recover pertaining to the commission of a crime is a cheap SKS every once in awhile.

          I was born and raised in Chicago, and would never go back there. Its a violent City, and the residents (in city limits) are unprotected except for the reactive thin blue line.
          Well we first have to know wtf they mean by assault weapons. Also they probably manipulated the statistic so that they are more used as a percentage of the weapons of that type available if that makes sense. For example if in there statistic there are 1 million handguns and 100,000 are used in crime then 10% of all handguns are used in crimes. But if there are 10,000 "assault weapons" and 2,000 of them are used in crimes then 20% of all assault weapons are used in crimes and are therefore twice as likely to be used in crime. It's a complete bull**** statistic if you look at it that way but that's the way it is. They make it sound like most people being shot these days are getting shot with " assault weapons " when in fact it's a handgun over 80% of the time.
          Originally posted by cudakidd
          I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
          ^

          Comment

          • #6
            Stonewalker
            Veteran Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 2780

            Looking for the data... but I'm at work and a bit limited. On average, 3% of crimes committed with a gun are committed with a rifle. The FBI does not keep records on AW-related crimes because there aren't enough to be statistically significant.
            member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF

            Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland Yee

            Comment

            • #7
              Nick Justice
              Senior Member
              • May 2010
              • 1985

              Originally posted by safewaysecurity
              Well we first have to know wtf they mean by assault weapons. Also they probably manipulated the statistic so that they are more used as a percentage of the weapons of that type available if that makes sense. For example if in there statistic there are 1 million handguns and 100,000 are used in crime then 10% of all handguns are used in crimes. But if there are 10,000 "assault weapons" and 2,000 of them are used in crimes then 20% of all assault weapons are used in crimes and are therefore twice as likely to be used in crime. It's a complete bull**** statistic if you look at it that way but that's the way it is. They make it sound like most people being shot these days are getting shot with " assault weapons " when in fact it's a handgun over 80% of the time.
              Right. Zimring tried to say that gun attacks were 20 times more deadly than knife attacks because 5% of gunshot victims died while 1% of knife victims died. It's dishonest statistic manipulation. Dishonest because it is not the whole truth.
              Last edited by Nick Justice; 10-21-2011, 4:37 PM. Reason: spelling
              It doesn't matter how scary, ugly, uncomfortable, or inconvenient self defense can be. Like it or not, you will never, ever be relieved of your duty and responsibility to defend your life, your family, your country and your freedom.

              How much ammo do I need? Enough to last me the rest of my life, and then lot more for later.

              The government does not come knocking at your door. It comes knocking down your door.

              Comment

              • #8
                krucam
                Member
                • Mar 2010
                • 334

                Originally posted by Silverlake223
                "and assault weapons are 20 times more likely to be used in
                the commission of a crime than other kinds of weapons"


                I think this is extremely incorrect! I think nation wide its like .5% or something low like that! Perhaps in Chicago they have a better class of criminal, but here in LA according to my LAPD friends, the only "assault weapons" they usually recover pertaining to the commission of a crime is a cheap SKS every once in awhile.

                I was born and raised in Chicago, and would never go back there. Its a violent City, and the residents (in city limits) are unprotected except for the reactive thin blue line.
                Misrepresentations like that abound in Chicago's response. They selectively term "assault weapons" as anything with more than 10 rounds. That means almost every Glock ever made...the "vs other kinds of weapons" would logically follow to be all the non-Glock (or Sig/M&P) handguns and legit bolt action Remingtons allowed.

                I lived in Chicago for many years and get back there often to visit family there. I rarely feel unsafe in the Wicker Park/Humboldt Park/Lakeview areas. I would still pack if given the opportunity.
                Mark C.
                DFW, TX

                Comment

                • #9
                  hoffmang
                  I need a LIFE!!
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 18448

                  This case is currently before the Illinois Supreme Court and many of us have very high hopes for the outcome.

                  -Gene
                  Gene Hoffman
                  Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

                  DONATE NOW
                  to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
                  Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
                  I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


                  "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Dreaded Claymore
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2010
                    • 3231

                    Originally posted by hoffmang
                    This case is currently before the Illinois Supreme Court and many of us have very high hopes for the outcome.
                    If Gene and his fellows can have high hopes for a case in the Illinois Supreme Court, well then there must be good cause for optimism.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Andy Taylor
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 1367

                      Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
                      If Gene and his fellows can have high hopes for a case in the Illinois Supreme Court, well then there must be good cause for optimism.
                      this

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        hoffmang
                        I need a LIFE!!
                        • Apr 2006
                        • 18448

                        Originally posted by Dreaded Claymore
                        If Gene and his fellows can have high hopes for a case in the Illinois Supreme Court, well then there must be good cause for optimism.
                        Remember that the IL Supremes are not just Chicago.

                        -Gene
                        Gene Hoffman
                        Chairman, California Gun Rights Foundation

                        DONATE NOW
                        to support the rights of California gun owners. Follow @cgfgunrights on Twitter.
                        Opinions posted in this account are my own and not the approved position of any organization.
                        I read PMs. But, if you need a response, include an email address or email me directly!


                        "The problem with being a gun rights supporter is that the left hates guns and the right hates rights." -Anon

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          oni.dori
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 1007

                          Originally posted by Silverlake223
                          "and assault weapons are 20 times more likely to be used in
                          the commission of a crime than other kinds of weapons"


                          I think this is extremely incorrect! I think nation wide its like .5% or something low like that! Perhaps in Chicago they have a better class of criminal, but here in LA according to my LAPD friends, the only "assault weapons" they usually recover pertaining to the commission of a crime is a cheap SKS every once in awhile.

                          I was born and raised in Chicago, and would never go back there. Its a violent City, and the residents (in city limits) are unprotected except for the reactive thin blue line.
                          Originally posted by m03
                          At the height of the AW FUD, AWs represented less than 3% of all guns used in crimes according to the FBI. It's been several years since I looked at it myself, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was 0.5% these days.
                          I have seen sources citing that they represent >.07%, that's less than POINT-ZERO-SEVEN PERCENT. Less than ONE PERCENT of all violent crimes commited in the U.S. I can't remember exactly where I saw that, but I will see if I can find it again.
                          Originally posted by 383green
                          Stockpiling ammunition is like investing in a 401k that allows you to make withdrawals in the form of kinetic energy.
                          Originally posted by oaklander
                          I will NOT be a part of a civil rights movement which contains its own version of "P.C."
                          5-23-11 The day the Sleeping Giant awoke.

                          "...What in the world is a moderate interpretation of a constitutional text? Halfway between what it says and what we'd like it to say?"
                          -A. Scalia 2005

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            oni.dori
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2010
                            • 1007

                            Originally posted by krucam
                            Misrepresentations like that abound in Chicago's response. They selectively term "assault weapons" as anything with more than 10 rounds. That means almost every Glock ever made...the "vs other kinds of weapons" would logically follow to be all the non-Glock (or Sig/M&P) handguns and legit bolt action Remingtons allowed.

                            I lived in Chicago for many years and get back there often to visit family there. I rarely feel unsafe in the Wicker Park/Humboldt Park/Lakeview areas. I would still pack if given the opportunity.
                            You are right. The term "assault weapon" has been so convoluted, overused, misquoted, perverted, and inbred, that it can essentially mean anything they feel like twisting it in to being.
                            Originally posted by 383green
                            Stockpiling ammunition is like investing in a 401k that allows you to make withdrawals in the form of kinetic energy.
                            Originally posted by oaklander
                            I will NOT be a part of a civil rights movement which contains its own version of "P.C."
                            5-23-11 The day the Sleeping Giant awoke.

                            "...What in the world is a moderate interpretation of a constitutional text? Halfway between what it says and what we'd like it to say?"
                            -A. Scalia 2005

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              SantaCabinetguy
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Feb 2011
                              • 15137

                              Originally posted by hoffmang
                              This case is currently before the Illinois Supreme Court and many of us have very high hopes for the outcome.

                              -Gene
                              Translatable outcome to help CA along?
                              Hauoli Makahiki Hou


                              -------

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1