Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Brady Campaign interns

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    GWbiker
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 733

    Originally posted by adrenaline
    LOL...I went back to check (see it yourself) they nuked all of Marlon's comments. So much for the first amendment.
    Yes, opposing views on the Brady Campaign facebook page are quickly deleted.
    "If 5% of Ducks could shoot back, would you go Duck hunting?"

    Comment

    • #17
      LHC30
      Member
      • Jan 2009
      • 441

      FWIW, there was a restraining order in place as of last Tuesday....lots o' good that paper did!

      Comment

      • #18
        SantaCabinetguy
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Feb 2011
        • 15137

        Originally posted by LHC30
        FWIW, there was a restraining order in place as of last Tuesday....lots o' good that paper did!
        because we all know that criminals respect laws...
        Hauoli Makahiki Hou


        -------

        Comment

        • #19
          Wherryj
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Mar 2010
          • 11085

          Originally posted by MatrixCPA
          My understanding was that you could carry in your home or business--even if it was within a GFSZ. You just need to LUCC when traveling to/from.
          That is why I said you'd have to be very careful. We even had a CG member who got arrested for open carry at a private business that was later determined to somehow not be so private.

          The law is designed to make a situation so complex that it is difficult to avoid committing an illegal act.
          "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?"
          -Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
          "Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
          I like my guns like the left likes their voters-"undocumented".

          Comment

          • #20
            MatrixCPA
            Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 173

            Originally posted by Wherryj
            That is why I said you'd have to be very careful. We even had a CG member who got arrested for open carry at a private business that was later determined to somehow not be so private.

            The law is designed to make a situation so complex that it is difficult to avoid committing an illegal act.
            Did this person own or work at the business?


            The second amendment of the United States Constitution is not a "loophole". -- California State Senator Doug La Malfa

            Comment

            • #21
              CHS
              Moderator Emeritus
              CGN Contributor - Lifetime
              • Jan 2008
              • 11338

              Originally posted by adrenaline
              Marlon P. Rabara:
              Why would you assume that I would be talking about firearms or kevlar? I'm saying maybe giving some time away from work to resolve her dispute using law enforcement or possible get/establish a restraining order or something. I thought the idea behind the Brady group was to prevent gun violence. It isn't always about taking guns away....put PREVENTING VIOLENCE.
              These are the kind of rational-thinking people that the Brady's are losing more of every day.

              He's right, the Brady campaign IS supposed to be about preventing violence. However, it's not. It's about banning guns. The Brady's almost never support ANY legislation aimed at preventing violence, even legislation that has nothing to do with guns. I'm glad that some of the people on their side, or on the fence are realizing this.
              Please read the Calguns Wiki
              Laws that forbid the carrying of arms...disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes...Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.
              --Cesare, Marquis of Beccaria, "On Crimes and Punishment"

              Comment

              • #22
                curtisfong
                Calguns Addict
                • Jan 2009
                • 6893

                Originally posted by CHS
                These are the kind of rational-thinking people that the Brady's are losing more of every day.

                He's right, the Brady campaign IS supposed to be about preventing violence. However, it's not. It's about banning guns. The Brady's almost never support ANY legislation aimed at preventing violence, even legislation that has nothing to do with guns. I'm glad that some of the people on their side, or on the fence are realizing this.
                There is a lesson to be learned here. ONE post like this is worth a million posts claiming how much you love God and need guns to revolt against the Big Liberal Media Government.

                Simple. Point out that Brady has no interest in preventing violence. Heck, claim you are a "liberal democrat" and even that you "have no interest in owning a gun". Remind everybody that Brady does not represent your interests, and that as a "liberal" you are dismayed that the Bradys are consistently against civil rights.
                The Rifle on the WallKamala Harris

                Lawyers and their Stockholm Syndrome

                Comment

                Working...
                UA-8071174-1