AB 809 and C&R transactions

[dantodd]

I suspect that Mr. Barrett would be more than happy to do this and, if possible, submit the C&R paperwork to the BATFE by hand, he's not very fond of CA's anti-firearms laws. He would absolutely lice the ability to ship his guns directly to CA residents.

[calidefector]

so we will no longer be able to do cash and carries in the state of Ca then?

I thought I read that you have to report it as you do handguns at this time. Perhaps someone can clear this up though.

[GOEX FFF]

so we will no longer be able to do cash and carries in the state of Ca then?

I thought I read that you have to report it as you do handguns at this time. Perhaps someone can clear this up though.

C&C in state between two unlicensed parties would be a no go.

C&C in state would now mean that is it only legal to do so with the buyer being having an 03/FFL+COE. Then upon acquisition, normal bound-book info entered then $19.00 and reg form off to DOJ.
Unlike C&R handguns that must only go to and 01 FFL, the 03/COE combo would be OK for C&R long gun online purchases. Then upon acquisition, normal bound-book info entered then $19.00 and reg form off to DOJ.
And currently like C&R handgun purchases if you purchase out-of-state, bringing back a C&R Long gun would require the $19.00 DOJ reg form and then normal info entered into the bound-book.


By the way the bill is written though it looks like in an in state sale, even the seller in a pvt. party-to-pvt.party has to hold an 03/COE as well.

If I'm reading it right, I'm questioning the legalities of that since someone doesn't have to be licensed to sell their own personal property...only the receiver of the firearm.

Edited for my mistake of interpreting the bill.

[hoffmang]

I suspect that Mr. Barrett would be more than happy to do this and, if possible, submit the C&R paperwork to the BATFE by hand, he's not very fond of CA's anti-firearms laws. He would absolutely lice the ability to ship his guns directly to CA residents.

He is. We've just all been busy.

-Gene

[dantodd]

He is. We've just all been busy.

-Gene

I might just be willing to get an 03/COE just for this. I actually have no interet in using an m82 with any regularity but if it gives the Brady Bunch heartburn, I'm all for it. Heck, I might just get it long enough to buy the .50 and then give up the license so I don't have to deal with the bound book forever.

[Mssr. Eleganté]

...By the way the bill is written though it looks like in an in state sale, even the seller in a pvt. party-to-pvt.party has to hold an 03/COE as well.

If I'm reading it right, I'm questioning the legalities of that since someone doesn't have to be licensed to sell their own personal property...only the receiver of the firearm.

I don't follow you.

The list of conditions you posted just says the person receiving the firearm needs to have the C&R FFL and the COE.