Peruta and Richards. With AB 144, what's next?

[notme92069]

With the passage of AB144, what will happen, and when? What are the next steps for these cases?

[1JimMarch]

I would think that a "notice of new authority" should be filed in each by the attorneys. I assume it would be similar to what happens when a new higher-court case comes down, except this is in fact a change in law. As each case is at the appeals court level but not yet decided, such news could be filed before a decision comes down.

I don't know if oral arguments have happened in either at the appeals court level.

Is it possible to go back to the deciding judges and say "hey, the basis for your decision has just changed out from under you!"?

[Purple K]

I would think that a "notice of new authority" should be filed in each by the attorneys. I assume it would be similar to what happens when a new higher-court case comes down, except this is in fact a change in law. As each case is at the appeals court level but not yet decided, such news could be filed before a decision comes down.

I don't know if oral arguments have happened in either at the appeals court level.

Is it possible to go back to the deciding judges and say "hey, the basis for your decision has just changed out from under you!"?

I think its called GVR

[hoffmang]

The reply brief in Richards is due shortly.

-Gene

[Liberty1]

What is most likely to happen, the appellate ct decides the issue or sends it back to district?

[Crom]

Basically some briefs will be filed with the court, a case management schedule will be established and agreed upon and then oral arguments will be scheduled. Once the court hears the arguments, the court will affirm or reverse the lower courts ruling.

I think both Richards and Peruta have had their schedules set... I think there is some action scheduled in November for Peruta, can't remember, must find link...

Looking forward to the new brief in Richards.

The Appeals Process

[Wherryj]

The reply brief in Richards is due shortly.

-Gene

It appears that CA politicians are entirely committed to protecting the job security of all of the lawyers at CGF/2AF/NRA.

[hoffmang]

It appears that CA politicians are entirely committed to protecting the job security of all of the lawyers at CGF/2AF/NRA.

CA State keeps running up bills for Counties to pay. More power to 'em.

-Gene

[yellowfin]

I guess the attorneys should demand a stadium or other piece of property as payment--a check that big is probably going to bounce if it comes from a CA municipality.

[Rossi357]

I guess the attorneys should demand a stadium or other piece of property as payment--a check that big is probably going to bounce if it comes from a CA municipality.

Change Petco Park to Second Amendment Park.

[Liberty1]

CA State keeps running up bills for Counties to pay. More power to 'em.

-Gene

Yolo can handle it. What's a mere million to share between Messrs Gura, Kilmer, & Davis? Yolo is rolling in tax receipts: http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/...ayoffs-jobs-9/

[freonr22]

Liberty, in that article, If its accurate, they indicate a $2.8 budget deficit. that's 2 dollars and 80 cents. Maybe my phone read it wrong

[pointedstick]

Liberty, in that article, If its accurate, they indicate a $2.8 budget deficit. that's 2 dollars and 80 cents. Maybe my phone read it wrong

Nah, just some sterling journalism!

[Liberty1]

Liberty, in that article, If its accurate, they indicate a $2.8 budget deficit. that's 2 dollars and 80 cents. Maybe my phone read it wrong

And yet they lost 10 deputies. That's about $0.28 per deputy/year!!!

[hoffmang]

And yet they lost 10 deputies. That's about $0.28 per deputy/year!!!

Because people are safer when they disarm the law abiding at the expense of deputies on the streets!

-Gene