Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

"home made" full auto machine guns legal in the 9th Circuit?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    dantodd
    Calguns Addict
    • Aug 2009
    • 9360

    Originally posted by Wolverine
    Thanks Kharm. I found the docket on the SCOTUS website. Case Number is 04-617. The subsequent 9th Circuit opinion upholding 922(o) can be found at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastor...df?openelement
    Tnx for posting that.
    Coyote Point Armory
    341 Beach Road
    Burlingame CA 94010
    650-315-2210
    http://CoyotePointArmory.com

    Comment

    • #17
      submaniac
      Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 241

      There is also the case of U.S. v. Dalton in which the 10th circuit invalidated FOPA.

      Many thanks to the AK-Build team...California's version of Khyber pass.

      Comment

      • #18
        Quiet
        retired Goon
        • Mar 2007
        • 30241

        Originally posted by Write Winger
        Who knew Illinois of all places you could build a FA gun... talk about enemy territory.
        Under IL state laws, AOWs are the only NFA firearms a non-exempt person can own/possess in IL.
        DD, MG, NS, SBR & SBS are illegal for all non-exempt persons in IL.
        sigpic

        "If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun." - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).

        Comment

        • #19
          Bhobbs
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Feb 2009
          • 11848

          Originally posted by Kharn
          The Government appealed Stewart the same term as Raich. Supreme Court held Stewart, granted Raich cert, went through the motions and found that growing pot in your backyard does affect interstate commerce. Stewart was GVR'ed with "reconsider in light of Raich", the Circuit Court reexamined the issue and home-built MGs were found to affect interstate commerce as you could have bought an out-of-state MG, thus 922(o) was legit.
          Well in CA 922(o) can't be legit because, without impossible to get licenses, we cannot buy MGs.

          Comment

          • #20
            6172crew
            Moderator Emeritus
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2005
            • 6240

            This comes up every year or so.

            Some guy built a Sten in garage and cops busted him. The DA went after him under the commerce act and the 9th said the Sten wasn't going to sold so it shouldn't fall under commerce act but then the whole 9th reviewed and said the commerce act does apply. So for a few months you could have been in limbo if you made your own Sten.

            I might have missed some details but I'm pretty sure this sums up what the OP was talking about.

            Nothing to see here folks/These are not the Droids your looking for.
            sigpic
            HMM-161 Westpac 1994

            Comment

            • #21
              m03
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2007
              • 1908

              Originally posted by 6172crew
              This comes up every year or so.

              Some guy built a Sten in garage and cops busted him. The DA went after him under the commerce act and the 9th said the Sten wasn't going to sold so it shouldn't fall under commerce act but then the whole 9th reviewed and said the commerce act does apply. So for a few months you could have been in limbo if you made your own Sten.

              I might have missed some details but I'm pretty sure this sums up what the OP was talking about.

              Nothing to see here folks/These are not the Droids your looking for.
              Yup, the case was discussed extensively on SubGuns.com back when it was still on-going.

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1