Response Letter From Dianne Feinstein

[21SF]

You guys are crazy, we all know she is a VIP and has more value on her life. Who would want to hurt us no-bodys

[Quser.619]

At least she responds, which more than I have ever gotten from Boxer. I don't with Feinstein about much, but she does generally respond when you write

[Iskra]

I kind of admire that she's unapologetic.

Most politicians would try to pretend that there's a middle ground where you & she could agree. At least its very clear where she stands. I think Boxer would completely waffle on the subject and end up saying a whole bunch of nothing at all.

[DannyInSoCal]

She never read your letter. That's simply the form letter sent out by a $100k per year union coddled admin assistant...

[loose_electron]

Coming from the woman who carry's a 38 in a her handbag at all time.

Interesting, you got a source on that?
I never really paid attention.

Thing is the NRA-ILA and their litigation process seems to be the most viable way to get the LTC issues resolved here.

[cmaynes]

I think a letter writing campaign to your local papers is a good idea- why does Dianne need a CCW but thinks that you dont....

[Ubermcoupe]

Did she sign it? or is just something an aide printed out and mailed to you?

I dislike that she refers to the California (as a whole) as an urban area.

[battleship]

She has a ccw and from my understanding she thinks her life is way more important than any of ours, she is a cow no ifs buts, about it.

Just google it you will find many blogs on the subject, because she is such a hypocrite.

[mag360]

Dear Dianne, it is not your duty as a US senator to take a utopian dream approach to decide which parts of the constitution you respect or deny. That's all. Arms include guns, bear means wear, and shall not be infringed is plain english.

[Untamed1972]

The problem with a federal policy mandating concealed carry reciprocity is that it would usurp the right of states to grant concealed weapons licenses in the manner, and to those individuals, that they see fit.

Isn't she the one that proposed basically a mandatory federal "may issue" minimum follow the Giffords shooting in AZ?

So why it ok to usurp states rights when it comes to taking guns away.....but not ok when it means lessening burdensome restrictions?

[Paul S]

She is OK with her "right" having a LTC, but not the populous? So much for equal protection under the law. I am so tired of politicians like DiFi looking down their noses at the citizenry, and having special rights. Political arrogance IMHO.

As the CGF statement makes it clear:

• Gun Rights
  
• Civil Rights
  
• Your Rights

While the woman is a disgrace to the Senate of the U.S. and the people of California...she gave up her LTC after leaving San Francisco. But you are correct..at the time at least..she had special rights...while the remainder of San Francisco residents had squat.

[nick]

She never read your letter. That's simply the form letter sent out by a $100k per year union coddled admin assistant...

Wrong, it's sent by about $100K (plus $17-20K/year maintenance agreement) CRM system

[darthnugget]

She never read your letter. That's simply the form letter sent out by a $100k per year union coddled admin assistant...

You are 100% correct. I know of first hand this system that they use for the form letters for response, and yes the person performing the job function is way over paid for their George Jetson type job.

[walkstep]

Thankfully Mrs. Feinstein and her colleagues are willing to represent the poor huddled masses who aren't responsible enough to protect themselves. Law enforcement resources in Democratic urban cities always protect their citizens from assault, robbery, murder and other violent crimes.

I've got to run now...time to go out and protest capitalism.

[scarville]

But she is Sincerely Yours!

Sin! That is an image I didn't need on a Friday afternoon