Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

12021 (c) (1)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • #46
    hvengel
    Member
    • May 2003
    • 440
    Can't a prohibited individual own mussel loaders? You can get both shot guns and rifles in mussel loaders. Not very convenient but they will do the job.

      Comment

      • #47
        Decoligny
        I need a LIFE!!
        • Mar 2008
        • 10615
        Originally posted by hvengel
        Can't a prohibited individual own mussel loaders? You can get both shot guns and rifles in mussel loaders. Not very convenient but they will do the job.
        Why would anyone want a weapon that shoots shellfish?

        Perhaps you mean "muzzle loaders?"

        Muzzle loaders are considered firearms, prohibited persons cannot possess firearms.
        sigpic
        If you haven't seen it with your own eyes,
        or heard it with your own ears,
        don't make it up with your small mind,
        or spread it with your big mouth.

          Comment

          • #48
            Meplat
            Calguns Addict
            • Jul 2008
            • 6903
            Originally posted by hvengel
            Can't a prohibited individual own mussel loaders? You can get both shot guns and rifles in mussel loaders. Not very convenient but they will do the job.
            I don't think prohibited persons can have muzzle loaders in CA. Buy the way do you shell your mussels before you load them, don't they tend to get the powder wet?
            sigpicTake not lightly liberty
            To have it you must live it
            And like love, don't you see
            To keep it you must give it

            "I will talk with you no more.
            I will go now, and fight you."             (Red Cloud)

              Comment

              • #49
                five.five-six
                CGN Contributor
                • May 2006
                • 34737
                interesting news... he went into court and had the convictions overturned, vision public now shows:

                Seq S/A Violation Date Section Statute OL Violation Plea Plea Date Disposition Dispo Date
                1 0 12/27/2005 148(a)(1) PC M Resisting public or peace officer NOT GUILTY 01/18/2012 Dismissal pursuant to Penal Code 1203.4 01/18/2012
                2 0 12/27/2005 242 PC M Battery NOT GUILTY 01/18/2012 Dismissal pursuant to Penal Code 1203.4 01/18/2012
                does this mean he can own a gun now? my thinking is yes

                  Comment

                  • #50
                    GOEX FFF
                    ☆ North Texas ☆
                    CGN Contributor
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 6240
                    Originally posted by five.five-six
                    interesting news... he went into court and had the convictions overturned, vision public now shows:

                    does this mean he can own a gun now? my thinking is yes

                    The only way to be sure, is have him send in a PFEC.
                    DOJ is the one who will decide that or not.

                    Frequently Asked Questions
                    http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pfecfaqs
                    Personal Firearms Eligibility Check Program What is a Personal Firearms Eligibility Check? What information is required for a Personal Firearms Eligibility Check (PFEC)? How much does the PFEC cost? How do I find a Notary Public? How long will it take to get the results of my PFEC? What records are checked to determine the results of my PFEC? Under what conditions is someone considered ineligible to possess and/or purchase firearms? Will the PFEC results include information about my criminal history?
                    Stand for the Flag - Kneel for the Cross

                    The 2nd Amendment Explained

                      Comment

                      • #51
                        five.five-six
                        CGN Contributor
                        • May 2006
                        • 34737
                        Originally posted by GOEX FFF
                        The only way to be sure, is have him send in a PFEC.
                        DOJ is the one who will decide that or not.

                        http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pfecfaqs
                        IMO, DOJ should be in the business of recording what the courts have decided.

                          Comment

                          • #52
                            17+1
                            Veteran Member
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 2847
                            Originally posted by hawk1
                            Stay on topic, this is not about under ground railroads, or about bounced checks, sex with teenage girls, or marijuana.
                            Signature worthy!

                              Comment

                              • #53
                                Kerplow
                                Calguns Addict
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 8875
                                Originally posted by five.five-six
                                interesting news... he went into court and had the convictions overturned, vision public now shows:
                                Great news! any details on how he pulled it off?
                                Originally posted by MelvinoelGreat**
                                My friend, your Chargers sure are looking good tonight. They are only losing by 14 at the half, not to bad my friend.

                                  Comment

                                  • #54
                                    five.five-six
                                    CGN Contributor
                                    • May 2006
                                    • 34737
                                    Originally posted by Kerplow
                                    Great news! any details on how he pulled it off?
                                    I am not exactly sure. I have not seen hum since Monday, but my understanding is that he asked to have the case re heard??? I am sure there was some paperwork and I will ask him to bring it in next time I see him.


                                    not guilty is not guilty.. right? so he can have guns now? right?

                                      Comment

                                      Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next

                                      Calguns.net Statistics

                                      Collapse
                                      Topics: 1,857,239   Posts: 25,029,466   Members: 354,385   Active Members: 6,348
                                      Welcome to our newest member, JU83.

                                      What's Going On

                                      Collapse

                                      There are currently 2034 users online. 31 members and 2003 guests.

                                      Most users ever online was 65,177 at 7:20 PM on 09-21-2024.

                                      Working...
                                      UA-8071174-1