Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Signs Historic Right-to-Carry Legislation Into Law

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • safewaysecurity
    Calguns Addict
    • Jun 2010
    • 6166

    Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Signs Historic Right-to-Carry Legislation Into Law



    Originally posted by cudakidd
    I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
    ^
  • #2
    boxbro
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 790

    Originally posted by safewaysecurity
    Illinois will hopefully get some more smackdown soon.
    "Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattles, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction....."

    "The Character of Man," Mark Twain's Autobiography

    Comment

    • #3
      MudCamper
      Veteran Member
      • Mar 2007
      • 4593

      But is it a shall-issue system?

      And will they have reciprocity with other states?

      Comment

      • #4
        Andy Taylor
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2007
        • 1367

        It is shall issue. Don't know about reciprocity, or if non resident permits are available.

        Comment

        • #5
          thai562
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 1199

          I LOVE THAT MAN!
          It is wrong for a man to love another man? Not in this case.
          Chris Christie too.

          Comment

          • #6
            safewaysecurity
            Calguns Addict
            • Jun 2010
            • 6166

            Originally posted by MudCamper
            But is it a shall-issue system?

            And will they have reciprocity with other states?
            Absolutely shall issue. They were going to go constitutional carry but w/e.
            Originally posted by cudakidd
            I want Blood for Oil. Heck I want Blood for Oil over hand wringing sentiment!
            ^

            Comment

            • #7
              RobG
              Veteran Member
              • Dec 2006
              • 4887

              Nice to see some states getting it right. Every time something positive happens in another state, it makes Kalifornia that much more F'd up.

              Comment

              • #8
                dustoff31
                Calguns Addict
                • Apr 2007
                • 8209

                The details are available here.

                "education without implementation is merely entertainment."


                Didn't see anything about non-resident permits being issued.

                There will be reciprocity/recognition of OOS permits. However, it appears to only cover only those with a CCW from their home state.

                People with permits from other states could carry concealed weapons in Wisconsin as long as they had gone through training and a background check in their home state.
                Now, this is interesting.

                Private businesses could post signs to keep guns out of their buildings. Signs could also be posted in government buildings, such as city halls and the state Capitol. But guns could not be banned from government-owned grounds, meaning they could be carried on the Capitol lawn or the Milwaukee Public Zoo.

                But under the bill, private individuals and groups that allow concealed carry on their property would have blanket immunity from any legal liability from that decision. Groups and individuals who post signs prohibiting concealed weapons would not receive that immunity.
                "Did I say "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." - Westbrook Pegler

                Comment

                • #9
                  Blackhawk556
                  Veteran Member
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 4182

                  WOW....******"But under the bill, private individuals and groups that allow concealed carry on their property would have blanket immunity from any legal liability from that decision. Groups and individuals who post signs prohibiting concealed weapons would not receive that immunity.".....I guess their way of thinking is, if you don't want people with guns on your property fine. But if they get harmed because they couldn't protect themselves you are responsible because you didn't provide adequate protection for them. Do I have this right ????????
                  sigpic PM 4 Front Sight diamond
                  "If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?"

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Brown Rock
                    Veteran Member
                    • May 2009
                    • 4492

                    Lucky bastards.
                    Fernando became an American the courageous way. By outrunning the speed boat.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      dustoff31
                      Calguns Addict
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 8209

                      Originally posted by Blackhawk556
                      WOW....******"But under the bill, private individuals and groups that allow concealed carry on their property would have blanket immunity from any legal liability from that decision. Groups and individuals who post signs prohibiting concealed weapons would not receive that immunity.".....I guess their way of thinking is, if you don't want people with guns on your property fine. But if they get harmed because they couldn't protect themselves you are responsible because you didn't provide adequate protection for them. Do I have this right ????????
                      That's my take on it.

                      But by the same token, on a non-posted property, say someone sees your gun, thinks you might be a bad guy and shoots you, or the place gets held up and you get shot. That owner has no liability either.
                      "Did I say "republic?" By God, yes, I said "republic!" Long live the glorious republic of the United States of America. Damn democracy. It is a fraudulent term used, often by ignorant persons but no less often by intellectual fakers, to describe an infamous mixture of socialism, miscegenation, graft, confiscation of property and denial of personal rights to individuals whose virtuous principles make them offensive." - Westbrook Pegler

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Window_Seat
                        Veteran Member
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 3533

                        The one thing that troubles me about these newly passed CCW measures is that these Legislatures don't include provisions prohibiting newspapers and other media publications/editors from publishing the personal information (like home addresses) of CCW licensees. I believe it happened in Iowa, and the Oregon Legislature tried to put a stop to it, but that measure was unsuccessful.

                        Erik.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Dreaded Claymore
                          Veteran Member
                          • May 2010
                          • 3231

                          Eventually, shall-issue CCW will come to Illinois. Eventually, maybe even to California.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Window_Seat
                            Veteran Member
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 3533

                            I'm looking to find out when this takes effect, and reading here & there that the law goes into effect on the 1st day of the 4th month after the "date of publication". Apparently this has not been officially published, or has it?

                            Anyone here familiar with the WI Legislature?

                            Erik.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Liberty1
                              Calguns Addict
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 5541

                              The bill also removes the prohibition against open carry in a vehicle.
                              False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
                              -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              UA-8071174-1