Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

AW: Wilson v. Cook County

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #61
    Liberty1
    Calguns Addict
    • Apr 2007
    • 5541

    FA .45 Thompson would be common too if they didn't require a tax payment the government won't collect on new manufacture.



    I buy sell and trade machineguns along with all types of firearms and firearm accessories.
    Last edited by Liberty1; 07-28-2011, 2:37 PM.
    False is the idea of utility that sacrifices a thousand real advantages for one imaginary or trifling inconvenience; that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils except destruction. The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.
    -- Cesare Beccaria http://www.a-human-right.com/

    Comment

    • #62
      Maestro Pistolero
      Veteran Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 3897

      Yep. And again, having secured the individual right separate from the militia clause, we STILL HAVE a militia clause.

      What do weapons that are designed for the security of a free state look like?
      (warning gigantic pics)


      www.christopherjhoffman.com

      The Second Amendment is the one right that is so fundamental that the inability to exercise it, should the need arise, would render all other rights null and void. Dead people have no rights.
      Magna est veritas et praevalebit

      Comment

      • #63
        Spelunker
        Member
        • Jul 2007
        • 458

        Do they have the ability to put a bullet button on in Illinois and have an AR variant? If no, is it that SB-23 thing that stops them?

        Comment

        • #64
          nicki
          Veteran Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 4208

          Illonis Supreme Court, I'm torn.

          I want the Illonis Supreme court to do the "right thing", but if they don't, I assume this could be appealed directly to the "SCOTUS"?

          I think the "SCOTUS" will take a "COSMETIC RIFLE BAN" if a clean case gets to them and in doing so, they would accomplish several things.

          1. They tell all the courts, fed and state that they are serious about the 2nd amendment.

          2. It could nail all state AW and mag cap laws.

          At this rate, we should have significant progress on gun rights within next 2 years.

          Nicki

          Comment

          • #65
            Untamed1972
            I need a LIFE!!
            • Mar 2009
            • 17579

            It's nice theyincluded the CMP reference as well. Hmmm.....even the Fed gov't sees the benefit in supplying citizens with semi-auto rifles to train and maintain markmanship proficiency for the benefit of acting in defense of the state.

            Seems these states/counties are gonna have a hard time justifiying a compelling state interest in banning protected items.....especially since the vast majority of the rest of the states and the federal gov't seem to have no issues with them.
            "Freedom begins with an act of defiance"

            Quote for the day:
            "..the mind is the weapon and the hand only its extention. Discipline your mind!" Master Hao, Chenrezi monastery, Valley of the Sun

            Comment

            • #66
              tonelar
              Dinosaur
              • Mar 2008
              • 6080

              Originally posted by Goosebrown
              My attorney friend states that Supreme Courts don't accept appeals cases to tell the prosecutors that they did a "really great job!".. they must see something here that makes them think that it has to do with MacDonald. I hope that is the case.
              I Agree, this could be very good for us.

              Originally posted by nicki
              I want the Illonis Supreme court to do the "right thing", but if they don't, I assume this could be appealed directly to the "SCOTUS"?
              ...

              Nicki
              ^- THIS 100%
              sigpic

              Comment

              Working...
              UA-8071174-1