I just read where the Republicans are negotiating with Democrats on a budget deal. One of the items on the table is a requirement that all regulations passed by the State be required to have a fiscal impact analysis. Basically Republicans are looking to end the wasteful regulations that hinder economic activity.
Why can't the 2A community use that sort of provision to block future firearms regulations? We all know that there is no benefit to the crazy laws and regulations adopted by this State with respect to firearms. So if there is a formal mechanism to attack these misguided attempts at reducing violence (the purported goal of most all of this garbage), couldn't we use it to our advantage?
I understand the devil is in the details about how any such agreement would be structured. But it seems to me it offers one more avenue to attack the antis. I've already contacted my representatives and endorsed that portion of the budget deal.
Or am I just drinking too much coffee this morning and am being optimistic?
Why can't the 2A community use that sort of provision to block future firearms regulations? We all know that there is no benefit to the crazy laws and regulations adopted by this State with respect to firearms. So if there is a formal mechanism to attack these misguided attempts at reducing violence (the purported goal of most all of this garbage), couldn't we use it to our advantage?
I understand the devil is in the details about how any such agreement would be structured. But it seems to me it offers one more avenue to attack the antis. I've already contacted my representatives and endorsed that portion of the budget deal.
Or am I just drinking too much coffee this morning and am being optimistic?

Comment