My quick thought.
I think that Mexico has a legit claim, but not against the manufactures and/or vendors. I would state it has a reasonable claim against the sovereign government of the United States.
The United States Of America allowed its agents (ATF - Solicitor General and its agents - INS Specifically its agents /Border Patrol - FBI - CIA- Homeland security and its agents) For knowingly and willfully assisting known terrorist to purchase items strictly forbidden to there country and assist in logistics for transporting and selling at a profit illegal arms & ammunition across a known international borders.
Said items/weapons only intended use by purchasers (terrorist) to be used to disrupt the sovereign government of Mexico and inflict terror on its citizens and to cause irreparable harm to it agents / military.
I would also state that this case will be submitted And tried before the Haig and will lead to charges that will be enforceable against agents of the United States.
I think that Mexico has a legit claim, but not against the manufactures and/or vendors. I would state it has a reasonable claim against the sovereign government of the United States.
The United States Of America allowed its agents (ATF - Solicitor General and its agents - INS Specifically its agents /Border Patrol - FBI - CIA- Homeland security and its agents) For knowingly and willfully assisting known terrorist to purchase items strictly forbidden to there country and assist in logistics for transporting and selling at a profit illegal arms & ammunition across a known international borders.
Said items/weapons only intended use by purchasers (terrorist) to be used to disrupt the sovereign government of Mexico and inflict terror on its citizens and to cause irreparable harm to it agents / military.
I would also state that this case will be submitted And tried before the Haig and will lead to charges that will be enforceable against agents of the United States.
Comment