Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

One for the opposition....

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 753X0
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 163

    One for the opposition....

    IN RE MATTER OF DENIAL OF APPLICATION OF DOWNING

    Mods, please feel free to delete if duped....
    "No matter what his 'right' is, said "clown" went about it in the wrong manner and I hope all LEOs don't judge the rest of us that way.
    Plus 1 for Officer Durant."
    "Rio"

    "Res ipsa loquitur"
  • #2
    glbtrottr
    Veteran Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 3547

    Disgusting how they use McDonald's language.
    On hold....

    Comment

    • #3
      SanPedroShooter
      Calguns Addict
      • Jan 2010
      • 9732

      "...appellant, argued the cause pro se"

      An anttorney who represents himself has a fool for a client?

      Comment

      • #4
        Stonewalker
        Veteran Member
        • Jun 2010
        • 2780

        Huh...they mention both Heller and McDonald, but they leave out this little tidbit of Heller

        carry.
        member: Electronic Frontier Foundation, NRA, CGF

        Deer Hunting Rifles? "Let's get rid of those too" - Adam Keigwin, Chief of Staff for Senator Leland Yee

        Comment

        • #5
          ElvenSoul
          I need a LIFE!!
          • Apr 2008
          • 17431

          Nanny can I have a cookie?
          sigpic

          Comment

          • #6
            Librarian
            Admin and Poltergeist
            CGN Contributor - Lifetime
            • Oct 2005
            • 44626

            Shows the value of good legal counsel.
            ARCHIVED Calguns Foundation Wiki here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908310...itle=Main_Page

            Frozen in 2015, it is falling out of date and I can no longer edit the content. But much of it is still good!

            Comment

            • #7
              Glock22Fan
              Calguns Addict
              • May 2006
              • 5752

              Well, this demonstrates the need for a widespread plan to use the right cases in the right places in the right order to achieve what we need. The only use this case has, maybe, is to demonstrate a split needing the Supremes to step in at some time.

              However, how much better to win the winnable cases first and then show precedents to courts like this, which can be expected in advance to be opposed to granting the plaintiff's case.
              John -- bitter gun owner.

              All opinions expressed here are my own unless I say otherwise.
              I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

              sigpic

              Comment

              • #8
                nicki
                Veteran Member
                • Mar 2008
                • 4208

                NJ court system

                NJ court system is corrupt.

                The Fed court system may not be much better, but at least it would eventually run into the SCOTUS.

                We will probably see a SCOTUS carry case within next two years and then we will be done with the garbage.

                Nicki

                Comment

                • #9
                  J.D.Allen
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2010
                  • 2340

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  UA-8071174-1