Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

So, how do we attack AB-962 next time?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #31
    1911_sfca
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2005
    • 1371

    Originally posted by Choptop
    Next time around the new version of AB962 will directly address the selling of any ammo to persons restricted by statute from owning ammo.
    +1. How about instead of a fingerprint log, a system that can check whether a person who buys ammo is prohibited from possessing it. This would of course run into the "bankrupt" problem that Gene mentions.

    Comment

    • #32
      Wherryj
      I need a LIFE!!
      • Mar 2010
      • 11085

      Originally posted by hoffmang
      Note that I've left a few things out...

      *Waves at Mrs. Graham*

      -Gene
      Might I also suggest the addition of a few "red herrings" just to keep the legislative critters on their toes?
      "What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?"
      -Antonin Scalia, Supreme Court Justice
      "Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.
      I like my guns like the left likes their voters-"undocumented".

      Comment

      • #33
        Choptop
        Member
        • Dec 2004
        • 387

        Originally posted by 1911_sfca
        +1. How about instead of a fingerprint log, a system that can check whether a person who buys ammo is prohibited from possessing it. This would of course run into the "bankrupt" problem that Gene mentions.
        that is exactly where this is headed.

        The only valid argument that I've seen to counter this is that BG checks for ammo purchases would be too costly.

        Comment

        Working...
        UA-8071174-1