Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Is it mandatory to have a cell phone?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • #16
    The Rattler
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 61

    Nothing has been given to me. And I have never asked got anything in return. My point was if they ask me to do something that I am not required to do (call 911), then if they don't provide the means, I can not be responsible to do it. Have had a cell phone since it was the size of a lunch box. But that was my choice. As is protecting myself and my family.
    Your Life, Your Right... Defend Them
    www.the2A.com

    find me on face book at California Carry

    Comment

    • #17
      tabrisnet
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2010
      • 526

      I guess the better answer than 911 is to call your local PD, assuming you know their number. Albeit I've found that they tend to be rather unhelpful if you're 1 mile out of their jurisdiction.

      Actually, that's a valid question... Can we just call our County Sheriff for all issues, and trust they'll either respond or fwd to the local PD? Or am I really stuck knowing the numbers for all the cities I pass through in California?

      Back in MI, I could call the Ottawa County PD and they'd happily relay to Kent County, Allegan County, or Holland City. Well, maybe not _happy_ but they'd do it on more than one occasion.
      Last edited by tabrisnet; 12-23-2010, 7:38 PM. Reason: s/respond to/respond or/
      Life SAF Member
      Life GOA Member
      EFF Member
      x7

      Comment

      • #18
        fiddletown
        Veteran Member
        • Jun 2007
        • 4928

        Originally posted by The Rattler
        ...My point was if they ask me to do something that I am not required to do (call 911),...
        Nobody is asking you to do anything. What you do and how you manage your affairs is up to you. Of course, your choices have consequences, so if you choose to deal with things in a manner that's unlawful, you can't complain if some of the consequences turn out to be unsatisfactory to you. But that's what freedom is all about. Freedom includes the freedom to fail -- the freedom to mess up your life.

        Originally posted by The Rattler
        ... if they don't provide the means, I can not be responsible to do it. ...
        You certainly can be and are.
        "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

        Comment

        • #19
          tabrisnet
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 526

          Originally posted by fiddletown
          Nobody is asking you to do anything. What you do and how you manage your affairs is up to you. Of course, your choices have consequences, so if you choose to deal with things in a manner that's unlawful, you can't complain if some of the consequences turn out to be unsatisfactory to you. But that's what freedom is all about. Freedom includes the freedom to fail -- the freedom to mess up your life.

          I love it when people feel compelled to present false choices. It's even true that you can choose to stop breathing rather than comply with anyone else's rules.

          The truth of self-defense is that you _can_ choose to not call 911 afterward... but then you might not present your case until after the cops have come to their own conclusions (or the original offending party has presented their case of why THEY are the victim).

          And claiming that NOT calling is unlawful... that's where the problem really starts. Good Samaritan laws are good for defending against lawsuits but suck if you are REQUIRED to report a crime in progress. That way leads to... well, I wish to not invoke Godwin's law (albeit this would be more Sovietski than Nationalsozialismus).
          Life SAF Member
          Life GOA Member
          EFF Member
          x7

          Comment

          • #20
            fiddletown
            Veteran Member
            • Jun 2007
            • 4928

            Originally posted by tabrisnet
            ...And claiming that NOT calling is unlawful...
            I never said that not calling 911 was unlawful. But what would be unlawful, and was mentioned by the OP, would be carrying a loaded gun without the proper permit.

            The OP is claiming that some authority is asking him to call 911 and somehow has an obligation to provide him with the means. Both notions are preposterous.
            "It is long been a principle of ours that one is no more armed because he has possession of a firearm than he is a musician because he owns a piano. There is no point in having a gun if you are not capable of using it skillfully." -- Jeff Cooper

            Comment

            • #21
              tabrisnet
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 526

              He seems to be stuck himself on a false dilemma, at least for the first notion.

              As to the second... it leads from the first and thus is just as flawed.

              Worse, taken to its logical conclusion it _may_ end up (legislatively) encumbering those of us who legally UOC, LOC, or CCW.
              Life SAF Member
              Life GOA Member
              EFF Member
              x7

              Comment

              • #22
                obeygiant
                CGN/CGSSA Contributor
                CGN Contributor
                • Oct 2007
                • 4167

                The FCC requires that all cell phones whether they are currently active or deactivated be able to place 911 calls. If you have an old cell phone and it can hold a charge you then have the ability to call 911 regardless of whether or not the phone is on an active plan.

                9-1-1
                Inactive telephones

                In the U.S., FCC rules require every telephone that can access the network to be able to dial 9-1-1, regardless of any reason that normal service may have been disconnected (including non-payment) (This only applies to states with a Do Not Disconnect policy in place. Those states must provide a "soft" dial tone service, details can be found at http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Ca...D/pntris99.pdf) On wired (land line) phones, this usually is accomplished by a "soft" dial tone, which sounds normal but will allow only emergency calls. Often, an unused and unpublished phone number will be issued to the line so that it will work properly. With regard to mobile phones, the rules require carriers to connect 9-1-1 calls from any mobile phone, regardless of whether that phone is currently active.[29] The same rules for inactive telephones apply in Canada.[30]

                When a cellular phone is deactivated, the phone number is often recycled to a new user, or to a new phone for the same user. The deactivated cell phone will still complete a 911 call (if it has battery power) but the 911 operator will see a specialized number indicating the cell phone has been deactivated. It is usually represented with an area code of (911)-xxx-xxxx. If the call is disconnected, the 911 operator will not be able to connect to the original caller. Also because the cell phone is no longer activated, the 911 operator is often unable to get Phase II information.[31]
                sigpic
                Member, CRPA Board of Directors
                "No one could make a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little." - Edmund Burke

                Search Calguns using Google
                CGN Search plugin for Firefox & IE CA Shotgun AW ID Flowchart CA Handgun AW ID Flowchart CA Senate CA Assembly Anti-2A Search Plugin

                Comment

                • #23
                  Gryff
                  CGSSA Coordinator
                  • May 2006
                  • 12679

                  Originally posted by The Rattler
                  If Anti gunners (and certain politicians/law enforcement) claim that calling 911 is an appropriate means of self defense... then shouldn't the government provide every citizen with a cell phone when away from home? And if they don't provide one, can it not then be argued that carrying a weapon was then justified as you had no means to call for help?

                  Any cell phone can call 911, whether you have the phone on an active cell phone plan or not.
                  My friends and family disavow all knowledge of my existence, let alone my opinions.

                  Comment

                  • #24
                    Window_Seat
                    Veteran Member
                    • Apr 2008
                    • 3533

                    When it comes to Govt defending bad laws, they might not even have a leg to stand on if they are using cell phone availability as a defense because no law can prevent a call not going through because you are in cell hell. As an example, when I go across Nevada, I just turn my cell phone off & put it on the charger because it says "NO SERVICE" across 90% of I-80. I-5 gets cut outs, so I'm lucky if I can get 15 seconds of continuous conversation, and it better be quick. Cell 911 service has been a joke since the beginning, and it should be part of the offensive when dealing with bad gun laws, especially when arguing for better CCW regs everywhere.

                    Erik.

                    Comment

                    • #25
                      Paul S
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 1847

                      This thread is quickly beginning to have the tone of the old false theological question of how many angels can stand on the head of a pin.

                      Calling 911 or not calling 911..it is your choice. Carrying concealed w/o a permit also your choice...but be ready for consequences on both issues.

                      But since it is all hypothetical it is meaningless. Is it not?
                      Last edited by Paul S; 12-24-2010, 10:03 AM. Reason: Spelling error
                      Lt. Col. Dave Grossman

                      Comment

                      • #26
                        N6ATF
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2007
                        • 8383

                        The fundamental problem is that the government doesn't expect you to talk...


                        Originally posted by obeygiant
                        The FCC requires that all cell phones whether they are currently active or deactivated be able to place 911 calls. If you have an old cell phone and it can hold a charge you then have the ability to call 911 regardless of whether or not the phone is on an active plan.
                        The key words being "...that can access the network" - you're SOL if you have an original StarTac (there is no longer an AMPS network in the U.S.) or a phone locked to a carrier that no longer operates the phone's standard.
                        Last edited by N6ATF; 12-24-2010, 12:49 AM.

                        Comment

                        • #27
                          KracknCorn
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 785

                          I've called 911 a couple of times and both times I was put on hold for more than 5 minutes. One of those times was because someone was being attacked... by the time the cops showed up, the wanna be thugs were already long gone.
                          Hartzler v. City of San Jose.
                          "The government owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack."

                          Comment

                          • #28
                            GOEX FFF
                            ☆ North Texas ☆
                            CGN Contributor
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 6183

                            Originally posted by The Rattler
                            Is it mandatory to have a cell phone? If Anti gunners (and certain politicians/law enforcement) claim that calling 911 is an appropriate means of self defense... then shouldn't the government provide every citizen with a cell phone when away from home? And if they don't provide one, can it not then be argued that carrying a weapon was then justified as you had no means to call for help?
                            Without dipping into the dialing 911 chat....
                            NO, the Fed Gov. cannot MAKE YOU buy something, just as much as they cannot MAKE someone buy health insurance.
                            Stand for the Flag - Kneel for the Cross

                            The 2nd Amendment Explained

                            Comment

                            • #29
                              Dutch3
                              I need a LIFE!!
                              • Oct 2010
                              • 14181

                              Cell service is pretty spotty in this area, and nonexistent in many places nearby. Sitting in my living room, I have about a 50-50 chance of a call staying connected.

                              If I drive 5 miles up the road, there is no service whatsoever. I don't depend on a cell phone very much. And good luck finding a pay phone around here (or anywhere else, for that matter).
                              Just taking up space in (what is no longer) the second-worst small town in California.

                              Comment

                              • #30
                                johnny_22
                                CGN/CGSSA Contributor - Lifetime
                                CGN Contributor - Lifetime
                                • Oct 2005
                                • 2180

                                An attempt at an answer

                                1. Cell phone is good, since the first caller is the victim. Second caller is the one getting arrested. If you defend yourself, you don't want to be running away looking for that last working payphone. "flee=guilt" in many jurists' minds.

                                2. Instead of punching in 911, store your local cop and Sheriff numbers for where you travel. In my day-to-day travels, it's only a few cities I need to enter. Lots of room in the phone. That way, you get immediate phone action.
                                Please, join the NRA.
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                UA-8071174-1